[Admin Moderator]

The poster made two others. It wasn't the content that got him nuked. It was the fact that it was one of our returning trolls. Does this every day. Repeatedly. Ad nauseum.

[conservativemusician]

I figured the screen name, sign on date, and article(without some sort of barf or whine alert) were fairly revealing troll signs.


BTW. Love that ZOT.

[pad 34]

Thanks for the explaniation. I was preparing the same article for posting-- figuired the content would generate some good remarks.

Glad to hear I wouldn't have been banned for ideas (not mine BTW).

That kind of refutes the articles whole premise-- Good Job!!

[section9]

The poster made two others. It wasn't the content that got him nuked. It was the fact that it was one of our returning trolls. Does this every day. Repeatedly. Ad nauseum.

Too bad.

I suspect you folks have an ISP tracer of some sort that allows you to track the ISP address of a poster? This is how you figure out who the trolls are, eh?

Can someone tell me, then, why you allow that goober MurryMom to hang around, then?

I mean, is it because she is as dumb as a box of rocks so you want to use her as an example of what not to be?

Be Seeing You,

Chris

[Stand Watch Listen]