Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuit will seek return of water pumped to Rogue Basin
Oregon Live ^ | 1/30/03 | Jeff Barnard

Posted on 01/31/2003 12:56:11 PM PST by AuntB

Lawsuit will seek return of water pumped to Rogue Basin

By JEFF BARNARD

The Associated Press

1/30/03 7:29 PM

GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) -- Environmentalists warned the federal government on Thursday they are going to court to restore water to salmon in the Klamath Basin that is now pumped over the Cascade Range to irrigate valuable pear orchards in the Rogue Valley.

The move represents an escalation in the legal battles over sharing water between fish and farms in the Klamath River Basin, with environmentalists sympathetic to Indian tribes and fishing downstream making a new demand for water controlled by farming in the upper basin.

"Our goal is to restore a fishery to the Klamath River, restore the health of the aquatic ecosystem of the Klamath-Trinity river basin, and have that be a part of normal life for people who live downstream," said Tim McKay, director of the Northcoast Environmental Center in Arcata, Calif.

The center joined with the Oregon Natural Resources Council in filing a 60-day notice of intent to sue the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, demanding that it consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service over environmental impacts of the Rogue Basin Project on endangered suckers and threatened coho salmon.

Built in the 1950s, the Rogue Basin Project pumps about 30,000 acre feet of water a year, enough for about 300,000 people, from creeks that run into Upper Klamath Lake and the Klamath River across the Cascade Range into reservoirs for irrigation serving pear orchards and other crops around Medford.

Among them are the orchards of Bear Creek Corp., one of the region's leading employers and producer of Royal Riviera pears shipped around the world in gift baskets sold by mail-order pioneer Harry and David.

"The water is absolutely critical to pear orchards," said Ron Meyer, a pear grower and president of the Talent Irrigation District, which gets the bulk of the diverted water. "Even though pear growing is not the bulk of the acreage in agriculture here ... it produces more value than all the rest of agriculture put together."

Though restoring the water to the Klamath River would reduce pressure on Klamath farmers to share irrigation water with fish, Dan Keppen of the Klamath Water Users Association said farmers opposed the idea.

"Every new litigation is going further to divide camps and keep us from sitting down and tackling the problem," said Keppen.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation regional office in Boise, Idaho, did not immediately return a telephone call for comment on the litigation. Typically, the federal government does not comment on pending lawsuits.

Jim McCarthy of the Oregon Natural Resources Council said the bureau began consultations required by the Endangered Species Act two years ago with Fish and Wildlife, but talks broke down and the bureau has yet to finish a biological assessment of the situation.

The water battles in the Klamath Basin reached a peak in 2001, when federal marshals were called in to guard irrigation headgates closed to conserve water for endangered Lost River and shortnosed suckers in Upper Klamath Lake and threatened coho salmon in the Klamath River.

Last fall, after the government restored full irrigation to the Klamath Reclamation Project, 33,000 salmon died in the lower reaches of the Klamath River. The California Department of Fish and Game blamed the fish kill in part on low and warm water left after upstream irrigation.

The Rogue Basin Project takes a third of the water from Jenny Creek, which flows through the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument into the Klamath River at Iron Gate Dam. It also taps water from Fourmile Creek, which flows through the Upper Klamath National Wildlife Refuge into Upper Klamath Lake.

About 24,000 acre feet of water from Jenny Creek is diverted into Hyatt and Howard Prairie lakes, which are the sites of popular resorts, campgrounds and sport fishing. It then flows through the Green Springs Power Plant before going into Emigrant Lake outside Ashland, a popular destination for camping and water sports.

About 6,000 acre feet of water is diverted from Fourmile Creek into Fish Lake, another boating and fishing resort, which serves as a reservoir for irrigation in the Rogue Valley.

----

Eds: Jeff Barnard has covered the environment since 1983.

Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: enviralists; extremeecoterrorism; klamathlist; landgrabs; propertyrights; waterwars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Well, folks, here it is...it has finally...literally...come to my back yard! I'm billed $185.00 per year for this water for one acre, whether I use it or not...whether I get it or NOT. Do you think my hard headed neighbors will believe there is a problem now??? No, probably not.

Here's the irony of this situation. A couple months ago the eco's announced adding a fuzzy little weed to the endangered list. I'll find the name of this plant momentarily. This thing grows all over my property...but it won't when I can't get water to it. Such a deal!!!

I held a theory when we were fighting the Klamath Falls situation that our neighboring valley wasn't attacked because of Bear Creek Orchards...owned by the Japanese, because they are typically big contributors to the enviro causes. I guess they forgot to send their bribe in this year!

1 posted on 01/31/2003 12:56:11 PM PST by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Klamath_List; *Enviralists; farmfriend
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
2 posted on 01/31/2003 12:58:18 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; farmfriend; EBUCK; Benighted; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; dixiechick2000; Iconoclast2; ...
Here we go again!! Would one of you good people hit the ping list for property rights?? I'd appreciate it and I'll be back later!
3 posted on 01/31/2003 12:58:37 PM PST by AuntB (Support our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
Thank you, darling!
4 posted on 01/31/2003 1:00:06 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; blackie; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; SierraWasp; B4Ranch; Jolly Rodgers; amom; Phil V.; ..
One thing you have to hand the enviromentalists...they sure don't give up, do they??
5 posted on 01/31/2003 1:13:53 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Wonder if this year it'll be as peacefull as last time. I mean, how much can a group take before it must resort to other means or starve?
6 posted on 01/31/2003 1:40:04 PM PST by EBUCK (....reloading....praparing to FIRE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
EBUCK, what ticks me off the most is that if ANYONE should be able to see the tragedy of what is happening to the small rural property owner in this country, it should be the "Indian tribes". They seek to do to us exactly what was done to them. A bunch of outsiders show up and decide what is best for you to do on your land.

On top of that we deal with the unrestricted migration of illegals. A neighbor of 30 years died last year. Her relatives sold the place, it WAS beautiful, to a guy who hires illegals to ...get this...plant trees, and moved in a dozen with their herd of goats (living on the front porch), plywood shacks and destroyed the place. That is the 3rd property in my once wonderful neighborhood that they bought out. Now, I ask you, what do you think my property is worth????Willing seller???? I couldn't give it away...and can't grow anything when they take this water!

7 posted on 01/31/2003 2:04:20 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Not on accident that this is happening to you IMO.

And the tribes are the favorite step children of the libs and envirals, not by their choosing I don't think, and are therefore regarded as more importtant than you, whitey, but still less so than fish and little weeds.

They'll get theirs if it comes to it and they know it.
8 posted on 01/31/2003 2:11:52 PM PST by EBUCK (....reloading....praparing to FIRE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797; Critter; spunkets; sasquatch; Texican; reformedliberal; Robert Drobot; redrock; ...
Ping for property rights!
9 posted on 01/31/2003 2:12:37 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
I held a theory when we were fighting the Klamath Falls situation that our neighboring valley wasn't attacked because of Bear Creek Orchards...owned by the Japanese, because they are typically big contributors to the enviro causes. I guess they forgot to send their bribe in this year!

Check to see if those Japanese investors have opted for a venture in China and intend to subdivide their holdings for retirement homes (after offering a suitable environmental set-aside of course).

Seriously.

10 posted on 01/31/2003 2:12:42 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
In isolated areas, the true tribes are getting shafted just like the rest of us. They own, work, live on and love their land just like I do. It's the Klamath "tribe" and a few other nare-do-wells that get to me. When white man first came across the Klamaths there were only about 800 of them. Now the number is in the thousands and like I asked one at Klamath at the headgates..."how do I get on this bandwagon??" as I explained to him that the tribe by laws state anyone can be a member of their "tribe". I've got more Indian in me than most of them.
11 posted on 01/31/2003 2:16:42 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
I absolutely will. By the way, their property borders mine. Nice, huh??
12 posted on 01/31/2003 2:17:57 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
as I explained to him that the tribe by laws state anyone can be a member of their "tribe".

Anyone? What kind of "tribe" is that. Is it actually recognized as an indian tribe? Is it just used to garner symapthy. Stay well, we might be meeting this summer if things really heat up...

13 posted on 01/31/2003 3:03:33 PM PST by EBUCK (....reloading....praparing to FIRE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
In the 60's the tribe was finally NOT recognized by the government because there were so few and they'd been paid off 3 times, with money and land. Then a few years ago, they got tribal status back.
14 posted on 01/31/2003 3:09:47 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
I'd like to see the requirements for tribal status....

1. Breathing
2. Indian heritage
3. Lack of any of the above shall not be construed as grounds for denial (not a river in Egypt).
15 posted on 01/31/2003 3:12:59 PM PST by EBUCK (....reloading....praparing to FIRE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Here's some background on the Klamath Tribe. I'm still looking for that statement from their website about anyone can be "invited" into the tribe.

The Klamath were first contacted by Whites in 1826. Since there were few fur-bearing animals in the area, Whites remained uninterested in the Klamath for some time. It is reported that even by the middle of the nineteenth century, there was only one gun among the Klamath. In 1864, the Klamath ceded most of their land to the U.S. Government and, with the Modoc and Paiute, were placed on the Klamath Reservation. Due to extensive intermarriage and migration, the Klamath constituted an "ethnic minority in the communities where they resided, even within the reservation." There were 2,118 members of the Klamath tribe in 1955, and 40 percent of them lived off the reservation. As of 1963, 70 percent of the members were less than one-half Indian, and less than one-sixth were full-bloods (Clifton and Levine 1963: 6).

In 1954, the membership voted for termination of federal administration of the reservation. Stern feels that as a result of this termination, the Klamath have become virtually extinct as a people. The cultural position of the Klamath was the subject of much debate among the authors of the 1930s, when tracing origins and the diffusion of cultural elements was a primary concern of anthropologists. This debate never resulted in any definitive conclusions. It is sufficient to know that features from cultures in the Great Basin, the Plateau, the Northwest Coast, and California were present in Klamath culture. The Klamath derived most of their subsistence from rivers and marshes. Fish was the staple of their diet, and pond lily seeds were also important. Roots were gathered to some extent. Deer and other game were of minor dietary importance. Permanent settlements of earth and mat lodges were located on the banks of rivers. These settlements were occupied during the winter months. They ranged in size from "several score" to one or two lodges. In the early spring, the people left the villages for fish runs. In the summer, small bands of two or three families occupied the prairies to collect roots and berries and other edible plants. Toward the end of the summer the pond lily seeds ripened, and the people gathered together at the marshes to harvest them. They returned to the same winter villages year after year. In spite of the fact that the environment had relatively abundant foodstuffs, the population was not very large. It has been estimated that aboriginally the Klamath numbered between 800 and 1,400. There were five or six geographical divisions of the Klamath. The largest one was in the vicinity of Klamath Marsh. Other groups lived in the vicinity of Agency Lake, the lower Williamson River, Pelican Bay, Klamath Falls, and the Sprague River Valley. There was some tendency toward endogamy within these divisions, but there was no political unity. On the reservation, these divisions completely disappeared. Warfare, feuds, and slave raiding took place between the subdivisions of the Klamath and with non-Klamath. Most reports state that the Klamath conducted slave raids yearly against the Achomawi and other Pit River Indians. Kroeber (1953: 319-320), however, felt that these reports were very exaggerated. Headmanship of the villages was weakly developed, and some settlements did not even have chiefs. The chiefs were people who had acquired prestige through warfare, were wealthy, were good speakers, and had had some spirit experiences. Most of Spier's (1930) informants indicated that shamans were of greater importance to the community than chiefs. Every Klamath sought spiritual power in vision quests, which took place at life crises such as puberty and mourning. The spirits were ill-defined, but primarily took the form of nature spirits or anthropomorphic beings.

16 posted on 01/31/2003 3:33:48 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
vision quests, must have has some serious native flora, LOL
17 posted on 01/31/2003 3:53:37 PM PST by EBUCK (....reloading....praparing to FIRE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
The water battles in the Klamath Basin reached a peak in 2001, when federal marshals were called in to guard irrigation headgates closed to conserve water for endangered Lost River and shortnosed suckers in Upper Klamath Lake and threatened coho salmon in the Klamath River.

After a year of silence on the suckers because it didn't serve them to mention them during the Salmon war on the lower Klamath the Sucker is suddenly revealient to their cause again.

How many of those fancy pears end up in Harry & David foofoo packs.

18 posted on 01/31/2003 3:54:21 PM PST by tubebender (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
"How many of those fancy pears end up in Harry & David foofoo packs."

Actually not many. The land near me is all new orchards, not really producing yet. Most of H & D's stuff is imported.

19 posted on 01/31/2003 5:20:52 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Thanks for the ping, Aunt B. Here we go AGAIN!!!!
20 posted on 01/31/2003 5:25:08 PM PST by justshe (Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor. Only YOU can prevent Freepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson