Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: browardchad; Frankie Fiveangels; Ligeia; Howlin; mhking; Poohbah
If Gaffney did say what Norquist is saying he said, then the White House staffer is owed an apology unless Gaffney has PROOF to back up his allegations.

Otherwise, Norquist is correct to disinvite a person who has apparently slandered a White House aide.
25 posted on 02/20/2003 5:10:54 PM PST by hchutch ("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch; browardchad
In the old days, this would have already been settled in a properly masculine fashion--dueling pistols at ten paces.

Norquist is perfectly within his rights to be angry if Mr. Gaffney cannot substantiate the charges.

26 posted on 02/20/2003 5:26:51 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: hchutch
Okay, thanks for the ping. I now have a better understanding of the disagreement. I sure wish someone would invite the two of them over for a beer and settle this misunderstanding / feud in private.
27 posted on 02/20/2003 6:26:35 PM PST by Ligeia (What we have here is a failure to communicate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson