Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese MIRV Test Successful
Yonhap News via JoongAng Ilbo ^ | 02/08/03 | N/A

Posted on 02/07/2003 7:14:07 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Yomiuri Shimbun of Japan reported in its Beijing dispatch on Feb. 8, 2003 that China successfully conducted the MIRV test on December, 2002, using Dong-Feng 21.

The report quoted Chinese sources as saying, "The missile launch test was conducted in mid-December last year at a PLA strategic missile base in Shaxi province, and MIRV technology was apparently employed."

This is apparently the first Chinese success of the MIRV missile test.

China is making feverish efforts to counter American Missile Defense technology and this shows that they made a meaningful progress, the paper reports.

China could not deploy MIRV missiles right away right after this successful test. But They could improve its accuracy and try to push for the early deployment of the missiles, the report adds.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; chinastuff; mirv; missile; test
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: maui_hawaii
But right now, we can't shoot down an ICBM on the launch pad, in flight or over downtown Los Angeles.
21 posted on 02/07/2003 7:50:40 PM PST by MediaMole (Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an accordian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii; TheOldLady
bttt
22 posted on 02/07/2003 7:52:56 PM PST by WatchNKorea ( http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a37a7ce78f9.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
While the ChiComs are MIRVing, the U.S. is downgrading its ICBMs to a mere one warhead per missile (under START ...... or some other ridiculous treaty).

I'll pose this question to you, then...You have two armies. One army has changed their mutiple warhead missiles to single-warhead missiles, the other has as many multiple warhead missiles as they can make. Who would you bet on?

23 posted on 02/07/2003 7:56:23 PM PST by Captainpaintball (The Chi-Coms are coming!!! Through Chi-Town!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
See post #6 :0)

24 posted on 02/07/2003 7:57:25 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
"Thank You Bill Clinton!"

I was going to say something along the same line.

Some legacy the Great Stainmaker left us. A legacy that endangers the very existence of our country. I despiiiiiise the man and his marital partner!!!!!
25 posted on 02/07/2003 8:02:16 PM PST by RecentConvert (get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
You said it all. My thoughts exactly!
26 posted on 02/07/2003 8:03:21 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 6, Staterooms As Low As $610 Per Person For Entire Week!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Exactly!
27 posted on 02/07/2003 8:06:12 PM PST by vishnu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
Of course I know that even at one warhead per ICBM we still have a significant strategic advantage over those clowns, MIRVed as they may be. But I still don't like the idea of downgrading our nuclear arsenal, especially in a world that seems to have gone MAD (as it were).
28 posted on 02/07/2003 8:09:23 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All
Here's another question: Is it not time for us to form a NUCLEAR strategic partnership with Japan? with their technological innovation, their military history, and their proximity, they would prove a valuable ally. Imagine a technology partnership with Japan--Just the other day, a Japanese scientist created an "invisibility cloak." We have that technology as well, but maybe by working together, we could reduce cost and speed up its implementaion. This would be great for hiding military installations and power plants. But what do I know, I'm just Captan Paintball...
29 posted on 02/07/2003 8:10:49 PM PST by Captainpaintball (The Chi-Coms are coming!!! Through Chi-Town!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
don't forget

Wen Ho Traitor Lee


30 posted on 02/07/2003 8:14:34 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead (It's all about ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
We are downgrading our nuclear capacity from 40,000 nukes to 25,000 nukes.

I think after the 3rd or 4th hit whoever it is will stop messing with us.

Not to mention we can drop it in a 5 foot circle and launch them from 100 miles off of anyones coast, leaving just a few minutes for them to say good bye to everyone.

31 posted on 02/07/2003 8:16:50 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
"invisibility cloak."

I've always wondered if there's any truth to the Philidelphia experiment. If Einstien was involved, I can't help but think "Hmmmmm."

32 posted on 02/07/2003 8:17:23 PM PST by concerned about politics (Stop supporting terrorism! Drill ANWAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Oh, Klintoon you are one big bastard. The Klintoon legacy continues. A coward, a mommas boy and narcissitic baboon and that is just his good qualities!
33 posted on 02/07/2003 8:18:02 PM PST by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr. Mojo
But I still don't like the idea of downgrading our nuclear arsenal, especially in a world that seems to have gone MAD (as it were).

Hell! I agree with you! Do you think China will adhere to any treaty? I don't. While we disarm, they are arming themselves to the teeth. (with our technology, no less)

Here's another thing to think about: If we are "not allowed" to put multiple warheads on our missiles, (although they can) are we still going to innovate--i.e. push multiple warhead technology to greater levels? Would we be allowed? Or would that draw criticism from our enemies here and abroad?

35 posted on 02/07/2003 8:22:40 PM PST by Captainpaintball (The Chi-Coms are coming!!! Through Chi-Town!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RecentConvert
Some legacy the Great Stainmaker left us. A legacy that endangers the very existence of our country. I despiiiiiise the man and his marital partner!!!!!

Well said. Are you a Bob Grant fan?

36 posted on 02/07/2003 8:25:27 PM PST by Norman Arbuthnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_747591.html
37 posted on 02/07/2003 8:28:38 PM PST by Captainpaintball (The Chi-Coms are coming!!! Through Chi-Town!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Yes, the multiple poison of billy, the bent one.
38 posted on 02/07/2003 8:33:04 PM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
 
play tape

39 posted on 02/07/2003 8:36:14 PM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
... the "Bent-Dong"... Yeah, that sounds chinese enough.
40 posted on 02/07/2003 8:36:17 PM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson