Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada: Anti-U.S. rhetoric cleaves Liberals
National Post ^ | Februari 10 2003 | Gillian Cosgrove

Posted on 02/10/2003 3:54:12 PM PST by knighthawk

At the dog-racing tracks in Florida, there are men and women whose job it is to sweep up after the greyhounds. Greyhounds are highly excitable animals, and they can leave a stinking mess.

I would rather swap jobs with a greyhound-track flunky than have the mission that some Liberal MPs from the Toronto area have assumed as apologists for one of the most wicked human swine to deface this planet, Saddam Hussein.

While some are propagandists for Saddam's genocidal empire, others have poured scorn on our best friends and allies, the Americans, and taken cheap shots at the Israelis. And the Prime Minister of Canada, to his shame, sits silent, leaving us with the impression that he may share their views. Indeed, my spy in the Liberal caucus tells me the PM has nodded approvingly when hearing some of these anti-American diatribes.

Two of these MPs hail from Mississauga (is there something in the water there?): Colleen Beaumier, the Liberal MP for Brampton West-Mississauga, and Carolyn Parrish, the Liberal MP for Mississauga Centre. These dingbats are competing to be politically correct in the eyes of the anti-American and pro-Palestinian causes.

What's happening in Mississauga and environs is a microcosm of the inflammatory rhetoric that is ripping the federal Liberal caucus in two. The rift deepened this week as Colin Powell, the U.S. Secretary of State, disclosed Iraqi's sorry record of obstructionism and non-compliance with weapons inspectors to the UN Security Council.

Beaumier has just returned from a one-woman peace mission to Baghdad where she met Iraqi officials, including Tariq Aziz, the Deputy Prime Minister, all of whom she found "extremely charming." Little wonder, then, that the CBC reported breathlessly, in coverage that gave her more face time than MPs normally enjoy, that she had received "the royal treatment."

Beaumier said she opposed a war on Iraq because "46% of the population is 16 and under. It would be a war on children and I don't believe Canadians would want to do that."

Is Baghdad Beaumier so enamoured of the Iraqi people that she can't see the lunacy of her words?

She conveniently overlooks the fact that Saddam has committed atrocities against his own people for decades and he is none too picky about sparing the children.

Indeed, he has found that one of the most effective ways to extract confessions from prisoners is to gouge out the eyes of their children in front of them.

This is the same Beaumier who last October lavished praise on Saddam's totalitarian regime as "a progressive country with health care for all and education and human rights for women, which is far more advanced than other friendly Middle Eastern countries."

She went on to describe this rogue power as "a secular state offering a relative degree of equality for all its citizens," unless you have the misfortune to be one of those less equal Iraqis like the Kurds who were the victims of genocide in 1988 when Saddam viciously used poison gas against them.

Next up to bat for the lunatic left is Carolyn Parrish. She threatened to quit the Liberal Party if Canada joined a war on Iraq without the mandate of the United Nations Security Council.

She was apoplectic with rage because John McCallum, the Defence Minister, dared to state the obvious: that Canada just might have to join a U.S.-led war against Saddam even if the UN did not sanction it.

"This is crazy," she fumed. "I don't think we should be helping Americans to get away with this. This is just the boys playing with their big toys and, although we can't stop the Americans, we don't have to legitimize this."

Of the mild-mannered McCallum, a graduate of McGill and Cambridge universities and former dean of arts at McGill, she raged, in the idiom of the gutter, "I can't believe McCallum is down in Washington farting around like this, making stupid statements."

These inflammatory remarks are offensive and insulting because they suggest that responsible U.S. leaders would make the immensely solemn decision to declare war with the impulsiveness of little boys.

Earlier last year, the censorious Parrish (who, according to a cabinet colleague, makes no secret of her ambition to succeed Hazel McCallion as mayor of Mississauga) wrote a letter to the Toronto Star suggesting that the terrorists had destroyed themselves and innocent victims on 9/11 because they were "desperate."

Beaumier and Parrish, the Mississauga Musketeers, have little in common, other than the female sex, their suburban roots, and the federal Liberal Party. They are certainly different in the way they finance their "fact-finding" missions. Careful not to appear in the pocket of the Iraqi regime, Beaumier "paid her own way and did a helluva a job," according to Donn Lovett, a long-time Calgary Liberal activist who claims to be a key Paul Martin supporter and who accompanied her on the recent trip to Baghdad. He estimated they each paid between $4,000 and $5,000 for the five-day visit.

Last May, Parrish, another Martin supporter, headed a group of nine MPs who visited the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Israel. The trip was funded by Palestine House, a Palestinian cultural centre in Mississauga. The delegation produced a report that was harshly critical of Israel.

Rounding out the west-end trio of MPs is Bonnie Brown of Oakville, who last week dismissed George W. Bush, the U.S. President, as little more than a spin doctor using smoke and mirrors to justify a war. "It was wonderful American showmanship," she said in reaction to his State of the Union speech. "I thought the writers used wonderful words ... but substantively there wasn't much in it."

Last year, Brown, with a straight face, compared any possible U.S. attack on Iraq to the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbour in 1941.

Contrast these rash and impulsive statements with the more thoughtful and balanced views of another Liberal MP from Mississauga, Albina Guarnieri, a diminutive woman whose stature is in inverse proportion to her heart.

In the Commons last week, as her Liberal colleagues heaped abuse on Bush and the Americans, Guarnieri stood up and said: "Obviously, we all hope that Iraq will do what is required to keep the peace, but in all likelihood, just a few weeks from now, I think our closest allies will be at war with a murderous regime that gases its own people and has weapons that threaten North American security. We are going to have to make a choice. Are we going to support our closest allies or are we going to give Iraq a vote of confidence by remaining neutral?"

Other thoughtful peace proponents in the Liberal Party include John Godfrey, of Don Valley West, and Carolyn Bennett, of St. Paul's. They also object to Canada joining a U.S.-led attack on Iraq without the sanction of the UN. But they are careful to avoid the minefield of strident anti-Americanism and the naive effort to turn Saddam, the despot, into Saddam, the defender of human rights. Godfrey has argued that Canada must not go to war unless the U.S. can prove that Iraq is an aggressor poised to attack and that this dangerous situation can no longer be contained by arms inspections.

Everyone knows the rhetoric of war tends to be inflamed and that truth is the first casualty. But I think the good burghers of Mississauga and Oakville have every right to feel disappointed at the outlandish statements of Beaumier, Parrish and Brown. (Parrish, mastering the art of a media stunt, even held up a bullet she brought back from the Middle East for a closeup.)

The three MPs continue to insist that, judging by the letters flowing into their riding offices, they have the support of the majority of Canadians. If so, it's a sad day for Canada.

gcosgrove@rogers.com


TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamerican; canada; carolynparrish; colleenbeaumier; liberals; propalestinian; rethoric

1 posted on 02/10/2003 3:54:13 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 02/10/2003 3:54:38 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Canada: Anti-U.S. rhetoric cleaves Liberals

Good! Let's hope they cleave themselves right out of power.

3 posted on 02/10/2003 4:03:03 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Bump.
4 posted on 02/10/2003 4:05:48 PM PST by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
And the Prime Minister of Canada, to his shame, sits silent, leaving us with the impression that he may share their views.

Oh brother. If the Canadians haven't figured out yet that Chretien is a reflexive anti-American, there's not much hope for them. Maybe they're just being polilte.

5 posted on 02/10/2003 4:05:58 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
This is the same Beaumier who last October lavished praise on Saddam's totalitarian regime as "a progressive country with health care for all and education and human rights for women, which is far more advanced than other friendly Middle Eastern countries."

I wanted to read this article at first. But when I see a sentence like this one I can't go on. The author has made his point -- these Canadian MP's are just lunatics, so blinded by anti-American hatred that they cannot tell right from wrong.

6 posted on 02/10/2003 4:06:15 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I wonder what the Canadian border would look like if Iraq and Saddam were situated just to the south of Canada, just where the U.S. currently sits.

The Mounties might have red jackets, but there would be brown stains on their pants.

7 posted on 02/10/2003 4:07:32 PM PST by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
You can now understand how us Conservatives in this Country (most of us from the West), simply cannot stand this Liberal Party of Pantloads!! Ontario has some good Conservatives but they are going to have to rise up in a mighty way if there is any hope for this Country at all. Chretien is a certified idiot and all that support him are too. Perhaps the time for Western separation has come.
8 posted on 02/10/2003 4:32:51 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (all us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: All
Oh Canada!

I will not be the one to throw the first stone, since the USA had Clinton for eight long, miserable and embarassing years.

May Canadians get rid of an unworthy leader, and may the consequences for inept rule not be as dire as that which we in the USA now face.

I hold out the same hope for Germany, but I write off France entirely.

10 posted on 02/10/2003 5:32:42 PM PST by sarasmom (I will journey to the grave of Jimmy Carter in order to spit on it.May my journey be soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
BTTT

Next up to bat for the lunatic left is Carolyn Parrish. She threatened to quit the Liberal Party if Canada joined a war on Iraq without the mandate of the United Nations Security Council.

Ms Parrish was recently caught calling Americans "Bastards", a slip for which she apologized Wednesday.

Ms Parrish is the Canadian counterpart of Ms Osama Murry (Patty Murray, the ditzy drip from Washington or Oregon that attempted to glorify OBL)

All Canadians should be ashamed of these liberal Saddam-lovers and apologists.

I, for one, am getting tired of the US-bashing from the Canadians, the French, the Germans, all of our so-called "allies".

11 posted on 02/27/2003 7:28:40 AM PST by OldSmaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
BTTT

Next up to bat for the lunatic left is Carolyn Parrish. She threatened to quit the Liberal Party if Canada joined a war on Iraq without the mandate of the United Nations Security Council.

Ms Parrish was recently caught calling Americans "Bastards", a slip for which she apologized Wednesday.

Ms Parrish is the Canadian counterpart of Ms Osama Murry (Patty Murray, the ditzy drip from Washington or Oregon that attempted to glorify OBL)

All Canadians should be ashamed of these liberal Saddam-lovers and apologists.

I, for one, am getting tired of the US-bashing from the Canadians, the French, the Germans, all of our so-called "allies".

12 posted on 02/27/2003 7:29:26 AM PST by OldSmaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldSmaj
Sorry for the double post.

Something is wrong with FR; I'm on DSL and everything is drrrraaaaggggiiinggg.

Anybody else have a problem?

13 posted on 02/27/2003 7:33:22 AM PST by OldSmaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson