Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sea Containers Barred From Ships to U.S.
Newsday.com ^ | Feb. 13, 2003 | JEANNINE AVERSA

Posted on 02/13/2003 12:48:58 PM PST by FairOpinion

WASHINGTON -- The Customs Service refused to let 13 sea containers destined for the United States be loaded onto ships at foreign ports because of insufficient details about their contents, a violation of a new federal rule.

The agency says it needs timely and accurate manifest information to effectively evaluate and identify cargo that may pose a risk to U.S. security.

With 5.7 million cargo containers entering U.S. seaports each year, Customs says it is critically important to prevent terrorists from using sea containers to smuggle nuclear, chemical, biological or other deadly weapons into this country.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biological; borders; cargocontainers; chemical; containers; nuclear; ports; portsecurity; seacontainers; seaportsecurity; security; shipping; shippingcontainers; smuggling; terrorism; terrorist; threat; wmd
Another example that a lot is indeed being done about border security. Checking containers in the foreign ports, before they even get to the US is a great idea.
1 posted on 02/13/2003 12:48:59 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
From the article:
Most carriers, however, seemed to be in compliance with the new rule. Of the paperwork reviewed on more than 142,000 sea containers last week, Customs found just the 13 containers that presented a problem.

Under the regulation, sea carriers must provide details of the contents of containers destined for the United States 24 hours before the cargo is loaded onto ships at foreign ports.
_______________________________________________________


This is a good idea, but if all they are going on is written documentation, one could easily lie. I hear people who are trying to smuggle weapons into America might do that. Or lie to the shipping companies about the cargo, and then the shipping companies wouldn't be lying, just repeating what they know.
2 posted on 02/13/2003 12:54:02 PM PST by eyespysomething (Deja-Moo (I've heard this BS before))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Read it carefully. Th regulations don't require that the containers actually be inspected, just that their contents must be documented.
3 posted on 02/13/2003 1:02:06 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
Oh cmon now, terrorists wouldn't lie on the paperwork, would they?

Contents: device, nuclear
Status: armed, boobytrapped
Food/FDA item: no
Shipper: Ummah Distributors Inc
USA Destination: any/not important

4 posted on 02/13/2003 1:05:02 PM PST by Sender (-A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. -WOPR-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson