Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jacko's nude kiddie snaps
http://www.thesun.co.uk ^ | 2 18 03 | From BRIAN FLYNN

Posted on 02/17/2003 9:48:33 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK

Jacko's nude kiddie snaps

From BRIAN FLYNN
in New York


MICHAEL Jackson was caught with explicit photos of naked children in his bedroom, The Sun can reveal.

The detective who led the first Jacko sex abuse probe ten years ago revealed he found the sickening hoard at Jacko’s Neverland ranch.

Bill Dworin discovered the photos spread around the bedroom as he probed allegations that Jackson molested a boy.

The find was kept quiet as prosecutors decided the shots would not convict him without 13-year-old Jordy Chandler’s testimony.

Jordy gave a statement telling how Jacko performed degrading sex acts with him. But the singer paid off Jordy’s family with £13million.

And there were no charges over the snaps because they were not sexual poses.

Retired LA cop Dworin told NBC: “We believed the child. He was a very credible witness.

“It’s obvious Jackson has an interest in children. That’s a concern.”

Jacko, 44, admitted sleeping with children in a documentary two weeks ago. Dworin told The Sun last week the star had an alarm to alert him if anyone approached his bedroom.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: boy; jackson; jackson5; michaeljackson; nude; pedophile; pedophilia; pictures; porn

1 posted on 02/17/2003 9:48:33 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Money buys alot. In this case, freedom to abuse children without prosecution.
2 posted on 02/17/2003 9:54:28 PM PST by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The Chandler boy's statement
3 posted on 02/17/2003 9:56:44 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spyone
See the GC article on Steve Harvey's website to find out everything you didn't know. The Sun no doubt will be the subject of a successful defamation suit.
4 posted on 02/17/2003 9:58:50 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spyone
if the boy gave an initial believable account and there were pics of naked children, why couldn't the state taken on Micheal Jackson even if the child ( or parents) withdrew the accusation?

can 't the state procede in the best interest of the child and society?

5 posted on 02/17/2003 10:01:14 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
He's a sicko, man. That link needs a warning.
6 posted on 02/17/2003 10:07:53 PM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
sicko
7 posted on 02/17/2003 10:08:41 PM PST by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry
Why you know as well as I do that the elite rich can buy their way out of trouble.

I'm sure that the CPS folks and their fellow JBT's in homojocko's jurisdiction are too busy harassing home-schoolers who might instill Christian values in their children (or even worse, Constitutional principles) than to interfere in the 'private matters' of one who's 'loved by millions'.

8 posted on 02/17/2003 10:17:23 PM PST by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: spyone
Any parent who allows their kid to spend the night with Jacko is pimping their child for a payout. I don't think the Chandler kid pre-dates allegations, so his parents pimped him for a big chunk of money.
10 posted on 02/17/2003 10:22:09 PM PST by evolved_rage (Davis is a POS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cato the Censor
Michael Sick-boy Jackson was raised as a Jehovah's Witness.
11 posted on 02/17/2003 10:41:20 PM PST by FreeCanuckistan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
This story is bunk.
13 posted on 02/17/2003 11:21:04 PM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
See the GC article on Steve Harvey's website (corrected broken link) to find out everything you didn't know. The Sun no doubt will be the subject of a successful defamation suit.

Holy smokes! This article is really hard to read because it is a poor scan (not a pdf or html), but it sure does make a pretty strong case that Jackson was setup from the start.

There are taped phone calls of the boy's father (Chandler) plotting the entire extortion attempt. And recall that despite many hours of time spent by prosecutors in LA and SanDiego, no grand jury was ever convened to hear criminal charges against Jackson. They could not find a single corroberating witness to anything that the boy said.

The father is a scum-bag dentist who used sodium amytal on his own son to elicit the testimony! The settlement came out of a civil suit (with a lesser standard of proof) that Jackson's lawyers felt he would lose.

14 posted on 02/17/2003 11:37:44 PM PST by clamboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Those that let him free for $$$$$ remain responsible for the other rapes that followed. How Californian, indeed.
15 posted on 02/18/2003 3:29:14 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry
Yes they can and should of... obviously, the D.A.(dumbass)
was afraid of this weird but rich, african? American.
Unfriggenbelievable... what about all these people we read about arrested for Child porn, i.e. naked photos of kids? Makes ya wonder... They need mikie's connections.
16 posted on 02/18/2003 4:18:34 AM PST by Terridan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
I'm a little torn between what would be worse - if this was really true - or if it wasn't. Part of me wonders if the guy is totally NONSEXUAL. Ratings Sweep? I won't be surprised if he does jump off that balcony. If he is a molester he deserves this, if he isn't???
17 posted on 02/18/2003 6:08:36 AM PST by DDDDaytonNot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
My concern is the three children that this sick f@## is raising as his own. He basically "purchased" these children by paying off their mothers.

In essence he has obtained three children that he can raise as his own sex toys.

18 posted on 02/18/2003 9:03:11 AM PST by One_who_hopes_to_know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
A little blast from the past.
19 posted on 11/19/2003 8:14:07 AM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson