Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

France Will Veto Iraq War Resolution if it Gets U.N. Majority- Chirac
Dow Jones | 03/10/03

Posted on 03/10/2003 11:50:25 AM PST by rumrunner

RTRS: France Will Veto Iraq War Resolution if it Gets U.N. Majority- Chirac


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: franceveto; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
Only headline so far.
1 posted on 03/10/2003 11:50:26 AM PST by rumrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
Weasel room?!?
2 posted on 03/10/2003 11:51:29 AM PST by VANHALEN2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
Fox is reporting the same.
3 posted on 03/10/2003 11:52:20 AM PST by Ragirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VANHALEN2002
That's a real weasel tactic, only to veto if the resolution would otherwise pass.
4 posted on 03/10/2003 11:52:25 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
FOX News just picked it up. We'd best just start the war now then.
5 posted on 03/10/2003 11:52:26 AM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
Only headline so far.

Fox just confirmed. Said the frogs will veto the resolution.

6 posted on 03/10/2003 11:52:49 AM PST by Aeronaut (This project is so important, we can't let things that are more important interfere with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
No matter what they will veto. Time to vote and get it on...Bombs away tomorrow I hope.
7 posted on 03/10/2003 11:52:54 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
Excellent, then we won't have to wait any ten days.
8 posted on 03/10/2003 11:53:10 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
Can we start this Now, Please!
9 posted on 03/10/2003 11:53:29 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Going ahead and attacking tonight might achieve a considerable amount of tactical surprise.

If Saddam's advisers are as much like Stalin's as I suspect, he may be banking on being able to avert an attack, and the advisers may not have the b***s to tell him he might be wrong.

10 posted on 03/10/2003 11:54:59 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VANHALEN2002
Weasel room?!?

If Chirac is in it, by definition it is a weasel room!

;^)

11 posted on 03/10/2003 11:55:19 AM PST by DrNo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VANHALEN2002
Chirac is signalling in advance that it's OK for the on-the-fence countries to abstain or vote for the resolution if they want to avoid pissing off the US - that France will take the hit to make sure there's no UN approval for our action in Iraq.

Michael Ledeen's column in NRO today advances an interesting theory as to why.
12 posted on 03/10/2003 11:55:33 AM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
So in other words, the Frenchies will only cast a NO vote that doesn't matter. How gallant!
13 posted on 03/10/2003 11:55:36 AM PST by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Never mind. I misread the headline.
14 posted on 03/10/2003 11:56:28 AM PST by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
France: "I'll jump off the bridge if you jump off first...(wink wink)" :o
15 posted on 03/10/2003 11:56:42 AM PST by BossLady (ChIRAQ & Saddam sittin' in a tree.....K.I.S.S.I.N.G.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
Oh my goodness, CNN was saying this a full hour ago. I've been off-board for a little while but felt sure this had been made known here.

Russian and France it seems. Although I heard speculation earlier that Putin still hadn't made the final decision. Moot point really if France does it.

Prairie
16 posted on 03/10/2003 11:57:15 AM PST by prairiebreeze ("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Redcloak
veto all you want, the eagle is gonna fly!
18 posted on 03/10/2003 11:57:23 AM PST by ncooper777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Chirac came on TV and announced this himself.

I suspect we just might have the votes.
19 posted on 03/10/2003 11:58:02 AM PST by Howlin (Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
We'd best just start the war now then.

Yes. If France truly is going to hold to this position, there's no need to bother participating in a fraud. The five permanent members have already made their positions known. There's no further need to have them "be counted." Tactical surprise does not lend itself to the setting of "deadlines" which an enemy can then prempt to fog up the battlefield. Powell should demand the vote today after the Blix b*tchslap. If the SC refuses, he should just walk out.

Enough.

20 posted on 03/10/2003 11:59:01 AM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson