Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

France's Chirac promises veto in U.N. Iraq vote
Reuters AlertNet ^ | March 10, 2003 | Reuters

Posted on 03/10/2003 1:35:36 PM PST by MadIvan

PARIS, March 10 (Reuters) - French President Jacques Chirac said on Monday France would use its U.N. Security Council veto to block a resolution authorising war against Iraq.

"Whatever happens, France will vote 'no'," Chirac said on France 2 and TF1 television in his first televised interview on the Iraq crisis.

"There could, effectively, be a majority of nine votes or more for a new resolution, one which would authorise war.

"If that was the case, then France would vote 'no'. France will vote 'no' because she considers tonight that there is no reason to wage a war to reach the goal we set ourselves, that is the disarmament of Iraq," he said in the joint interview.

The French leader, who has led opposition to U.S. demands for Iraq to be disarmed of its suspected weapons of mass destruction by force, said he believed Russia and China -- fellow veto-holding permanent members of the Council -- were also ready to use their vetoes.

Earlier Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said Moscow would vote against a new draft U.N. resolution by the United States, Britain and Spain giving Iraq until March 17 to disarm or face war.

However, the French president said Iraq was not cooperating sufficiently with U.N. arms inspectors looking for alleged weapons of mass destruction.

"It's not for you or me to say whether the inspections are effective, if Iraq is sufficiently cooperative -- it is not, by the way, I'll tell you that straight away", Chirac said.

He also said no decision had been taken on a French call for heads of state and government to travel to New York for a U.N. vote on the new resolution. A vote on the draft resolution is expected this week.

France last week proposed that leaders of all five permanent member countries in the Security Council attend the voting session, saying it was important that decisions concerning life and death be taken at the highest level.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: blair; bush; chirac; eu; france; franceveto; iraq; saddam; uk; un; us; warlist
This was just broadcast on Sky News. What a treacherous piece of slime Chirac is.

Have you seen this man?

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 03/10/2003 1:35:36 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *war_list; mumbo; Siouxz; Otta B Sleepin; Mr. Mulliner; Semper911; Bubbette; Kip Lange; ...
Ping!
2 posted on 03/10/2003 1:36:10 PM PST by MadIvan (Learn the power of the Dark Side, www.thedarkside.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Is no the same thing as a VETO?
3 posted on 03/10/2003 1:38:32 PM PST by goldylight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"It's not for you or me to say whether the inspections are effective, if Iraq is sufficiently cooperative -- it is not, by the way, I'll tell you that straight away", Chirac said.

This man is certifiable. What in the h*ll does this mean? It's not for me to say if inspections are effective or if Iraq is cooperative. But I'll tell ya, it's not cooperative. But, it's still not cause for war. Yada, yada, yada...

What a frickin' idiot.

4 posted on 03/10/2003 1:41:10 PM PST by Wphile (I'M SO SICK OF THE IRAQ DEBATE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

5 posted on 03/10/2003 1:42:37 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

6 posted on 03/10/2003 1:44:11 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
A NO vote is the same as a Veto from any of the Permanent Council Members. We found the UN Charter that said all Permanent Council Members have to approve a resolution of this type. A No vote by a Permanent Voting Member is the same as a veto.
7 posted on 03/10/2003 1:45:54 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"It's not for you or me to say whether the inspections are effective, if Iraq is sufficiently cooperative -- it is not, by the way, I'll tell you that straight away"

Yes, I'm sure he would tell us right away. And I have a bridge named Pont Neuf that I can let you have cheap. It only costs 25% of your oil fields.

This guy should be an embarassment to France but, I fear, he is not. And that, dear friends, is the saddest fact of all.

8 posted on 03/10/2003 1:48:06 PM PST by sofaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Do it! I double dog dare you.
9 posted on 03/10/2003 1:50:02 PM PST by DeuceTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
France is working hard to prevent the US from reaching the 9 votes necessary for the US/UK resolution to pass so that they will not have to use their veto. Otherwise it would not be necessary to send Dom deV on a whirlwind tour of African nations with a suitcase full of money.

That suggests that France won't use a veto if the US gets 9 votes.
10 posted on 03/10/2003 1:51:47 PM PST by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
BUMP
11 posted on 03/10/2003 1:55:25 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Soddomite rewards his faithful lover ChIraq for his devotion to Soddomite!

12 posted on 03/10/2003 1:58:11 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"It's not for you or me to say whether the inspections are effective, if Iraq is sufficiently cooperative -- it is not, by the way, I'll tell you that straight away", Chirac said...

That's a jaw-dropper. France is a permanent member of the [blanking] UN Security Council and, by definition, it is their [blanking] job to say if inspections are effective and hold Iraq accountable for not cooperating.

13 posted on 03/10/2003 2:02:39 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (Let's Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Okay.

So, what are we waiting for?

14 posted on 03/10/2003 2:05:58 PM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Freep THE WORM here...
15 posted on 03/10/2003 2:19:07 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

16 posted on 03/10/2003 2:20:35 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
To paraphrase Ebenezer Scrooge: "France! Bah! Humbug!" That country has not had a decent army since the time of Napoleon!
17 posted on 03/10/2003 2:26:59 PM PST by Ebenezer (Remember the Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

18 posted on 03/10/2003 2:31:16 PM PST by AgThorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Done deal.
19 posted on 03/10/2003 2:36:05 PM PST by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson