Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Myth of Interference
Salon (ugghhhh, but it is a good article) ^ | David Weinberger

Posted on 03/12/2003 8:00:34 AM PST by eno_

There's a reason our television sets so outgun us, spraying us with trillions of bits while we respond only with the laughable trickles from our remotes. To enable signals to get through intact, the government has to divide the spectrum of frequencies into bands, which it then licenses to particular broadcasters. NBC has a license and you don't.

Thus, NBC gets to bathe you in "Friends," followed by a very special "Scrubs," and you get to sit passively on your couch. It's an asymmetric bargain that dominates our cultural, economic and political lives -- only the rich and famous can deliver their messages -- and it's all based on the fact that radio waves in their untamed habitat interfere with one another.

Except they don't.

(Excerpt) Read more at salon.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abc; cbs; fcc; hollywood; lamestream; nbc
David P. Reed is a genuine genius. If he says spectrum allocation is screwed up, listen up!
1 posted on 03/12/2003 8:00:34 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eno_
Note:
Linux system only; hardware - software project.
2 posted on 03/12/2003 8:34:51 AM PST by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Excellent article. And we owe a bit of thanks to the woman below, who helped develop this technology as referenced here:

One of the simplest examples of an architecture that works was invented during World War II. We were worried that the Germans might jam the signals our submarines used to control their radio-controlled torpedoes. This inspired the first "frequency-hopping" technology:


Hedi Lamar.

3 posted on 03/12/2003 8:35:41 AM PST by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
I'm not sure I buy all of his arguments. If I open a pinhole in a dark room, I'll get an image on the other side. True. But if I also fire a laser, an arc lamp, and a strobe light through that hole, am I going to be able to see anything? I'm willing to believe that more can be sqeezed across the bandwidth than is currently being sent but I find it difficult to believe that if this were so simple, the telcoms wouldn't be using it to, say, increase the bandwidth of fiber optic transimissions under the ocean.
4 posted on 03/12/2003 11:41:41 AM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
My favorite analogy is the difference between AM and FM radio.
If we could see the AM signal coming off of a broadcasting tower, it would look like a flickering light, since amplitude modulation means varying strength of the output. In the case of FM, frequency modulation, the frequency is being changed instead of the strength, so that the output coming off the tower would look like an everchanging rainbow, or maybe a kaleidoscope.
5 posted on 03/12/2003 12:42:38 PM PST by gcruse (When choosing between two evils, pick the one you haven't tried yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
It isn't "simple." Software-defined radios are not simple. But they are now cheap. Such radios, and mesh networks, and other innovations should break the FCC/LamstreamBroadcast/CellularTelco spectrum monopolies. And that would be a very good thing.
6 posted on 03/12/2003 1:41:13 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson