To: Oldeconomybuyer
Has anyone heard any explanation of the implications of destroying WMD, since we know we have to provide "irrefutable evidence" to the world in order to win the PR war?
2 posted on
03/24/2003 5:19:45 AM PST by
Illbay
(Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
To: Illbay
"Has anyone heard any explanation of the implications of destroying WMD,"
*snort* So they can't be used on US troops!
3 posted on
03/24/2003 5:26:03 AM PST by
Rebelbase
(that was a no-brainer)
To: Illbay
I guess we want to destroy the stuff that can hit us and capture the stuff that can't. Plus if some of the illegal stuff is destroyed, it's never completely destroyed. (Nazis tried to destroy the bodies of its victims but it's - frankly speaking - difficult to actually obliterate things.)
4 posted on
03/24/2003 5:28:54 AM PST by
bucephalus
(Baghdado Est Delenda!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson