Skip to comments.
The Sedition Act of 1798
self, congress
| 1798
| self, congress
Posted on 03/29/2003 9:18:29 AM PST by cgbg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
This makes very interesting reading. Most major media coverage today and many of the disruptive peace protests would clearly be in violation of that act.
1
posted on
03/29/2003 9:18:29 AM PST
by
cgbg
To: cgbg
Sedition?
2
posted on
03/29/2003 9:19:40 AM PST
by
wireman
To: cgbg
Most major media coverage today and many of the disruptive peace protests would clearly be in violation of that act.Except the sunset provision has passed some time ago.
3
posted on
03/29/2003 9:20:55 AM PST
by
inquest
To: cgbg
That act was allowed to expire in 1801. Please try to keep up.
4
posted on
03/29/2003 9:22:27 AM PST
by
per loin
To: wireman
sedition?
Oops. ;-)
5
posted on
03/29/2003 9:24:22 AM PST
by
cgbg
(We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
To: cgbg
Shouldn't WAR be DECLARED by CONGRESS for this to be effective? Just asking, don't know the answer, but heard it somewhere?
6
posted on
03/29/2003 9:25:53 AM PST
by
PISANO
To: per loin
Please try to keep up.
I guess I have come down with a bad case of nostalgia. ;-)
7
posted on
03/29/2003 9:26:43 AM PST
by
cgbg
(We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
To: inquest
Except the sunset provision has passed some time ago. And criminalizing libel probably wasn't such a hot idea in the first place anyway...
8
posted on
03/29/2003 9:26:49 AM PST
by
general_re
(The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.)
To: cgbg
Bump
9
posted on
03/29/2003 9:26:55 AM PST
by
Fiddlstix
To: cgbg
I'm going to lobby congress to pass the spellchecker act.... :) I"m keeeding!!
10
posted on
03/29/2003 9:29:01 AM PST
by
isom35
To: cgbg
If the act weren't already allowed to expire, certainly it would have been stricken down by Executive Order by Bill Clinton. That Chinese Silkworm missile shot at Kuwait City last night had his name all over it. Thanks again, Bill.
To: general_re
criminalizing libel not a great idea
Wouldn't it be cool, though, if the families of KIAs, MIAs, or POWs could sue the media for giving aid and comfort to the enemy that was a contributor to the damage caused their families?
I just don't like seeing the media get a free ride on their atrocious conduct during this war.
12
posted on
03/29/2003 9:31:56 AM PST
by
cgbg
(We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
To: general_re
Liberal
13
posted on
03/29/2003 9:32:36 AM PST
by
inquest
To: cgbg
The media I can ignore to a point.
The violent pIEce activists determined to shred our society into pieces
NEED PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW.
IMHO.
14
posted on
03/29/2003 9:32:48 AM PST
by
Quix
(QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
To: cgbg
The Alien and Sedition Act was clearly unconstitutional, and has been a blot on John Adams's record for two hundred years.
The interesting thing in terms of today's situation is that the Alien and Sedition Act was passed in response to the XYZ affair, in which French Foreign Minister Talleyrand demanded a $250,000 bribe from Adams before he would consider normalizing relations between France and the USA, which at the time were drifting perilously close to war.
The slogan "Millions for defense, not a cent for tribute" dates from that time.
It was anti-war, pro-French sentiment and activism from Republicans (Jeffersonians) that cause Federalist Adams to seek to shut them up with the Alien and Sedition Act.
15
posted on
03/29/2003 9:38:49 AM PST
by
beckett
To: cgbg
The nice thing is, eventually people get sick of that kind of thing and stop listening. They can spin things any way they like, but with the rise of the internet and places like FR, it's getting harder and harder every year for them to get away with it. The days of the press as the exclusive disseminators of information, and therefore "truth", are becoming increasingly limited.
So take heart - you're witnessing the dying spasms of a herd of dinosaurs ;)
16
posted on
03/29/2003 9:44:28 AM PST
by
general_re
(The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.)
To: inquest
Liberal Shhh, I'll tell you a secret - I'm not wild about debtor's prisons or child labor either. Me and my bleeding heart ;)
17
posted on
03/29/2003 9:47:06 AM PST
by
general_re
(The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.)
To: general_re
Yeah, and you were saying on the other thread that you wanted to let civilians out of Baghdad before we went in. I don't know what I'm gonna do with you...
18
posted on
03/29/2003 9:48:42 AM PST
by
inquest
To: inquest
Whatever you're going to do, you should probably do it fast - I figure it's only a matter of time before my bleeding-heart liberalism gets me banned ;)
19
posted on
03/29/2003 9:57:22 AM PST
by
general_re
(The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.)
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson