Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Sedition Act of 1798
self, congress | 1798 | self, congress

Posted on 03/29/2003 9:18:29 AM PST by cgbg

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That if any persons shall unlawfully combine or conspire together, with intent to oppose any measure or measures of the government of the United States, which are or shall be directed by proper authority, or to impede the operation of any law of the United States, or to intimidate or prevent any person holding a place or office in or under the government of the United States, from undertaking, performing or executing his trust or duty, and if any person or persons, with intent as aforesaid, shall counsel, advise or attempt to procure any insurrection, riot, unlawful assembly, or combination, whether such conspiracy, threatening, counsel, advice, or attempt shall have the proposed effect or not, he or they shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and on conviction, before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, and by imprisonment during a term not less than six months nor exceeding five years; and further, at the discretion of the court may be ho]den to find sureties for his good behaviour in such sum, and for such time, as the said court may direct.

SEC. 2. And be it farther enacted, That if any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the constitution of the United States, or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

SEC. 3. And be it further enacted and declared, That if any person shall be prosecuted under this act, for the writing or publishing any libel aforesaid, it shall be lawful for the defendant, upon the trial of the cause, to give in evidence in his defence, the truth of the matter contained in Republication charged as a libel. And the jury who shall try the cause, shall have a right to determine the law and the fact, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.

SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue and be in force until the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and one, and no longer: Provided, that the expiration of the act shall not prevent or defeat a prosecution and punishment of any offence against the law, during the time it shall be in force.

APPROVED, July 14, 1798


TOPICS: War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: abc; cbs; history; media; pbs; reuters; sedition; thenewyorktimes; thewashingtonpost; traitors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
This makes very interesting reading. Most major media coverage today and many of the disruptive peace protests would clearly be in violation of that act.
1 posted on 03/29/2003 9:18:29 AM PST by cgbg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Sedition?
2 posted on 03/29/2003 9:19:40 AM PST by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Most major media coverage today and many of the disruptive peace protests would clearly be in violation of that act.

Except the sunset provision has passed some time ago.

3 posted on 03/29/2003 9:20:55 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
That act was allowed to expire in 1801. Please try to keep up.
4 posted on 03/29/2003 9:22:27 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wireman
sedition?

Oops. ;-)
5 posted on 03/29/2003 9:24:22 AM PST by cgbg (We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Shouldn't WAR be DECLARED by CONGRESS for this to be effective? Just asking, don't know the answer, but heard it somewhere?
6 posted on 03/29/2003 9:25:53 AM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Please try to keep up.

I guess I have come down with a bad case of nostalgia. ;-)
7 posted on 03/29/2003 9:26:43 AM PST by cgbg (We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Except the sunset provision has passed some time ago.

And criminalizing libel probably wasn't such a hot idea in the first place anyway...

8 posted on 03/29/2003 9:26:49 AM PST by general_re (The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Bump
9 posted on 03/29/2003 9:26:55 AM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
I'm going to lobby congress to pass the spellchecker act.... :) I"m keeeding!!
10 posted on 03/29/2003 9:29:01 AM PST by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
If the act weren't already allowed to expire, certainly it would have been stricken down by Executive Order by Bill Clinton. That Chinese Silkworm missile shot at Kuwait City last night had his name all over it. Thanks again, Bill.
11 posted on 03/29/2003 9:30:33 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re
criminalizing libel not a great idea

Wouldn't it be cool, though, if the families of KIAs, MIAs, or POWs could sue the media for giving aid and comfort to the enemy that was a contributor to the damage caused their families?

I just don't like seeing the media get a free ride on their atrocious conduct during this war.
12 posted on 03/29/2003 9:31:56 AM PST by cgbg (We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Liberal
13 posted on 03/29/2003 9:32:36 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
The media I can ignore to a point.

The violent pIEce activists determined to shred our society into pieces

NEED PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW.

IMHO.
14 posted on 03/29/2003 9:32:48 AM PST by Quix (QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
The Alien and Sedition Act was clearly unconstitutional, and has been a blot on John Adams's record for two hundred years.

The interesting thing in terms of today's situation is that the Alien and Sedition Act was passed in response to the XYZ affair, in which French Foreign Minister Talleyrand demanded a $250,000 bribe from Adams before he would consider normalizing relations between France and the USA, which at the time were drifting perilously close to war.

The slogan "Millions for defense, not a cent for tribute" dates from that time.

It was anti-war, pro-French sentiment and activism from Republicans (Jeffersonians) that cause Federalist Adams to seek to shut them up with the Alien and Sedition Act.

15 posted on 03/29/2003 9:38:49 AM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
The nice thing is, eventually people get sick of that kind of thing and stop listening. They can spin things any way they like, but with the rise of the internet and places like FR, it's getting harder and harder every year for them to get away with it. The days of the press as the exclusive disseminators of information, and therefore "truth", are becoming increasingly limited.

So take heart - you're witnessing the dying spasms of a herd of dinosaurs ;)

16 posted on 03/29/2003 9:44:28 AM PST by general_re (The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Liberal

Shhh, I'll tell you a secret - I'm not wild about debtor's prisons or child labor either. Me and my bleeding heart ;)

17 posted on 03/29/2003 9:47:06 AM PST by general_re (The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Yeah, and you were saying on the other thread that you wanted to let civilians out of Baghdad before we went in. I don't know what I'm gonna do with you...
18 posted on 03/29/2003 9:48:42 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Whatever you're going to do, you should probably do it fast - I figure it's only a matter of time before my bleeding-heart liberalism gets me banned ;)
19 posted on 03/29/2003 9:57:22 AM PST by general_re (The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson