Posted on 04/12/2003 4:07:33 AM PDT by John W
LOS ANGELES - An Egyptian immigrant's deadly attack on an Israeli airline ticket counter last year has been ruled a terrorist attack related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, an FBI spokesman said Friday.
"Given his political views and the fact that El Al is an Israeli government-owned airline, that met the criteria for a terrorist attack," said Matthew McLaughlin, a spokesman for the Los Angeles field office of the FBI.
Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, 41, opened fire at Los Angeles International Airport's El Al ticket counter on July 4 last year, killing two people before being shot dead by an airline security guard.
The Department of Justice had withheld characterizing the shooting while federal agents launched a worldwide probe to determine whether it was a terrorist attack, hate crime or motivated by personal reasons.
The FBI findings were made several months ago and were recently approved by the Justice Department. McLaughlin said his office was told not to issue a press release but was given permission to confirm the decision if asked.
He said Hadayet acted alone and had no ties to any terrorist organization.
The investigation, however, found that Hadayet supported the Palestinian cause in the Israel-Palestine conflict and had become increasingly militant in recent years.
"The investigation developed information that he openly supported the killings of civilians in order to advance the Palestinian cause," McLaughlin said.
He said Hadayet bought the weapons used in the attack just weeks before the shooting, closed his bank accounts and sent his family overseas. He walked into the terminal with a .45-caliber semiautomatic Glock pistol, a 9 mm handgun and a six-inch knife.
The two people killed were Yaakov "Jacob" Aminov, 46, and Victoria Hen, 25, who worked behind the counter. Several other people were injured.
Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center said he believed all along the shooting was a terrorist attack and was satisfied the Department of Justice ruled it one.
"It's an attack on Americans because there's no way he could determine that only Jews travel on El Al," Hier said. "He was out to commit a terrorist attack to make a point and threaten Americans. ... (It) caused tremendous panic around the country. People didn't travel and they didn't go to the airport."
The finding also contradicts the notion that Hadayet acted for personal reasons or because he was despondent over financial problems, said Hier, leader of the Jewish human rights organization.
Hadayet, who lived in Irvine, was $10,000 in debt at the time of the shooting and his once profitable Orange County limousine businesses had been struggling, authorities said.
He applied for asylum with the Immigration and Naturalization Service in the early 1990s, but his application was rejected. He skipped a 1995 removal hearing and stayed in the United States with a work permit. He became a permanent U.S. resident after his wife won her residency in the U.S. visa lottery program.
In a 1993 interview for asylum, Hadayet told U.S. immigration officials that Egyptian authorities arrested him and accused him of involvement with Al-Gamma'a al-Islamiyaa, the Islamic Group. The group at the time was waging a violent effort to topple the secular Egyptian government and replace it with Islamic rule.
Hadayet said he was falsely accused of belonging to the group, which is now on the State Department's list of terrorist organizations.
The point may be that this is a subtle bit of support for the Israeli view of the world, a small confirmation that we know that the U.S. and Israel are on the same side in the same war. This is especially appropriate as world attention moves to Syria (and as we also start hearing about the "road map" for Israel and the Palestinians again).
Of course
a terrorist attack is not a hate crime
and never is motivated by personal reasons.
George Orwell would have loved this sentence.
Where do they find people who can write them?
Oh, I forgot. Public school graduates.
This is a good point.
There is a major distinction between: (1) the psychological reasons underlying a person's deciding to become a terrorist, and (2) the political reasons underlying the machinations of those exploiting terrorists for their own ends. This distinction is very commonly obscured, as if it didn't exist.
That goes along with the idea that the latest statement from the FBI is a timely expression of our support for Israel.
here is a story about someone who is apparently not a muslim, er, i mean terrorist:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/08/23/florida.explosives/
terrorism is a real threat, but the fight against it is being undercut by such misuse of the term.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.