To: EternalVigilance
Everything in the story suggests that the law is being followed to a tee. Jawohl, mein Herr.
11 posted on
04/12/2003 9:55:34 PM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional.)
To: brityank
Jawohl, mein Herr. Yes? Care to back that up from something in the article, or from my comment, or from other my postings on FR? Or are just jerking your knee?
There is a rule on FR--you must not know about it. The first person to call someone a Nazi loses the debate. Since you went straight to it before there was even any debate, you must enjoy losing quickly, and getting it out of the way.
To: brityank
Actually, I was open minded here. I did some reading.
It appears that a Grand Jury is investigating a criminal
matter to which Mike Hawash may have some information
to add to, as a material witness. This does not say that
he is involved, or is criminally liable for anything.
At the least, his testimony should be taken, and he
should be released afterwards, if it is not contradictory
to established facts.
This person is a U.S. Citizen. I don't really care where
he was born, or who his wife is, or how blonde she is.
Or that he works for Intel, or the local Grocery.
This makes me squirm the same way Reno's debacle at
Waco did.
20 posted on
04/12/2003 10:13:34 PM PDT by
ISawIt
(Is it just me?)
To: brityank
Sorry, but my bull$hit meter is pegging out. This doesn't pass the smell test.
1. Only paper with the story is The New York Times?
2. This isn't Reno's Justice Dept.
I'm waiting for more info (and being Palistanian, unfortunately, does cause closer scrutiny.)
67 posted on
04/15/2003 3:38:55 AM PDT by
bullseye1911
(I'm still the product of public education (but trying to overcome it!))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson