Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jennings Warns of “Aggressive Efforts” to Hush Anti-War Celebs
MRC ~ Cyber Alert ^ | 04-16-03

Posted on 04/16/2003 8:31:56 AM PDT by Zacs Mom

Jennings Warns of “Aggressive Efforts” to
Hush Anti-War Celebs

ABC's Peter Jennings sees an ominous new threat in the world. Not weapons of mass destruction or terrorism, but another vast right-wing conspiracy at home, specifically, the supposedly “well organized and aggressive efforts to make life very difficult for celebrities who speak out against the war.”

     Jennings ended Tuesday's World News Tonight with this plug for Wednesday's show: “That is our report on World News Tonight. Tomorrow on the broadcast, the well organized and aggressive efforts to make life very difficult for celebrities who speak out against the war. I'm Peter Jennings. Have a good evening, and good night.”

     I can't wait to hear how all the celebrities who were regularly appearing on cable news before the war were suppressed. And if people choose not to watch their shows or buy their CDs, that's the free market and the public just expressing its disagreement with their views.

     Apparently Jennings doesn't consider it newsworthy to examine how celebrities erroneously predicted disastrous events would result from the war or whether some owe an apology, like Janeane Garofalo who promised that she'd admit it if she were proven wrong. (See item #7 below for more on Garofalo.)

     That's probably because he too would have to admit that he was wrong.

     Jennings' agenda is probably inspired by some recent whining from actor Tim Robbins, who was Tuesday's luncheon speaker at the National Press Club. On Monday's Today show, prompted by the Baseball Hall of Fame cancelling an appearance by him, Robbins contended that the message is that “if you would disagree with this administration you can and will be punished."

     MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens caught how on the April 14 Today Matt Lauer tossed up a bunch of softballs to Robbins, who used Baseball Hall of Fame President Dale Petroskey's decision to cancel an event marking the 15th anniversary of the movie Bull Durham in which Robbins starred, as an excuse to spout off about how he's being oppressed.

     Robbins charged: “He basically says that if you do not agree with this President you don't have the right to this particular forum. You do not have the right to come to Cooperstown. Which is a very punitive and, and aggressive kind of way of dealing with the situation....And by doing it in the public way he did, by sending it to the AP at the same time he's sending it to me he's trying to, he's trying to send a message out which is basically, if you would disagree with this administration you can and will be punished."

     Robbins echoed himself: “We're sending out messages to the public on an almost daily basis that they have no right to protest against this President."
     Matt Lauer cued up Robbins: "So when the Dixie Chicks say, 'I'm embarrassed by President Bush being from Texas,' radio stations pull their music and people stomp on their CDs."
     Robbins spun a conspiracy tale: "But let's not forget the connection between Clear Channel or the Bush administration or the connection between Petroskey and the Reagan administration and prominent Republicans that he's worked for including Elizabeth Dole. This is, this is an endemic problem and it's a terrible situation, a terrible message to be sending out."

     If Robbins fears Elizabeth Dole, about as mushy a moderate as you can find, he really has insecurity issues.

     Lauer tossed Robbins another softball pitch: "How did this climate get created, in your opinion?"
     Robbins: "We are fighting, we are fighting for freedom for the Iraqi people right now, so that they can have the freedom of speech, yet we are telling our own citizens that they have to be quiet at home, that they have to acquiesce to this president in a time of war. And he said, okay, he said, 'This war will be lasting a long, long time.' So when can we disagree with him?"
     Lauer finally challenged him: "You, you've said in the past you think this is a war based largely on oil. When, when you see the scenes of people celebrating in the streets of Baghdad and tearing down statues, does it change your opinion as to our need to go in there at all?"
     Robbins is still unmoved: "No, I am ecstatic that they feel this freedom. I hope that they, that we have the resolve to, to get in there and make it work. So far we've lost our focus on Afghanistan, it seems to me. And, and we have a terrible track record as far as our military leading to democracy. Look at Panama, look at Nicaragua. It's not, it's not in our best interest for some reason to keep it going."

     Back for a second round after the 8:25am local news break, Lauer re-cued Robbins for his spiel: “What do you think about the climate we're living in right now where the Dixie Chicks records are pulled, where Madonna pulls a music video because she's afraid that people will misinterpret as anti-war, anti-troops?"
     Robbins: "Yeah, well it's, it's kind of scary. It's kind of scary because not, not because of me or Susan or, you know, the, her United Way thing being cancelled or the Baseball Hall of Fame. Those things are in, in the radar, we get, we get to talk about them, we get to discuss them and we get to, you know call Dale Petroskey to the, to the carpet on, on his actions. What, across the country this kind of stuff is happening on a daily basis. We were just down in Florida this weekend at a family reunion and almost everyone I talked to was telling me about something in a school, in a local district, that is not being reported, about, you know kids being intimidated for anti-war views, people being suspended for wearing peace signs. An event cancelled because they chose to pray for Iraqi civilians that were killed. Really crazy stuff. A disc, one of these, a talk radio person in the South calling for the murder of Hollywood celeb, a particular Hollywood celebrity. Crazy stuff. What is going on here?”
     Lauer: "You mention timing. I mean it seems as if the rules is if troops are engaged do not criticize."
     Robbins: "We will have troops engaged and we have had troops engaged for the last 20 years somewhere in the world. It's not, you can't go on that, on that basis. This war, according to the President, is going to last a very long time. Do we cancel the next election because we can't criticize this guy? Why, why are they so concerned? Why can't they engage in the debate of it? Don't they have points that they have to, that they can make. I mean the problem is we are dealing with a, with a situation where people are, are abdicating their First Amendment rights in fear. This is not what we, what this country is built on. We, we are supposed to be able to vigorously talk about issues and debate subjects."

     How exactly are you being silenced when the most-watched national morning television show gives you a platform?

     See a picture of Robbins and a rundown of his film roles, check the page for him on the Internet Movie Database.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: actor; antiamerica; antibush; antiwar; appeasers; celebrities; celebritygods; celebrityidols; clintonlegacy; conspiracy; hate; hateamerica; hollywood; hollywoodagainstwar; hollywoodaxisofevil; hollywoodelite; hollywoodgods; hollywoodhatesusa; hollywoodhero; hollywoodleft; hollywoodshutup; kneesoncutglass; liberalliars; liberalpress; loser; mediabias; moralbankruptcy; rightwing; robbins; socialelites; socialnannys; spoiledrichbrats; stars; threats; timrobbins; traitors; tyranny; usefulidiots; whiners; worshipmecelebrity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
“well organized and aggressive efforts to make life very difficult for celebrities who speak out against the war.”

I can't help but wonder why it is that, whenever average Americans speak out against an injustice, the press collectively labels and dismisses these voices as a vast right-winged conspiracy?

1 posted on 04/16/2003 8:31:57 AM PDT by Zacs Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom

"My feelings - as usual - we will slaughter them all"
2 posted on 04/16/2003 8:33:12 AM PDT by COURAGE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
I DEMAND THAT THIS IDIOT BE MADE TO LEAVE MY COUNTRY! I AM SO FED UP AND SICK OF THIS HATE-MONGERING, ANTI-AMERICAN CANADIAN COMMUNIST!!!!!!!
3 posted on 04/16/2003 8:35:26 AM PDT by Tulsa Brian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE
ROTFLMAO!!!

The Marines next mission: Free James Brolin!!!!!!!
4 posted on 04/16/2003 8:37:02 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (America...love it or leave it. Canada is due north-Mexico is directly south...start walking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE
Very good!
5 posted on 04/16/2003 8:37:15 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE
OMG!!!!!!!!!! That is awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!
6 posted on 04/16/2003 8:37:56 AM PDT by lawgirl (Bad spellers of the world--UNTIE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
the supposedly “well organized and aggressive efforts to make life very difficult for celebrities who speak out against the war.”

It's funny how this works, Peter. I'm just a working smoo, and my paycheck is not dependent upon what millions of Americans think of me, just my bosses. Now, someone becomes a celebrity making millions of dollars, namely because millions of Americans are willing to pay money because of what they think of that person's singing or acting. Now, that person goes BEYOND singing and acting and makes a political statement that deeply bothers millions of people who in the past PAID MONEY to that person. Should they just keep on supporting that person's lavish lifestyle? Should they basically somehow be COMPELLED to keep sending their hard-earned money to a person they now dislike? How ELSE, Peter, would you make a celebrity immune from the consequences of their actions?

The liberal mantra reaches new levels of absurdity with each passing day.

7 posted on 04/16/2003 8:38:00 AM PDT by dirtboy (United States 2, Terror-sponsoring regimes 0, waiting to see who's next in the bracket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
“well organized and aggressive efforts to make life very difficult for celebrities who speak out against the war.”

Where do I join up?

8 posted on 04/16/2003 8:38:26 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE
Kudos
9 posted on 04/16/2003 8:39:49 AM PDT by Delphster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom; kristinn; tgslTakoma; Angelwood
What a bunch of whiners. They can be aggressive as they want in their language to the President, but they don't like it when people speak back to them.

Hey Kristinn!! Peter Jennings is contemplating you for being "well-organized." I'm beginning to think this year's White House Correspondent's Dinner will just be a series of compliments to you!

10 posted on 04/16/2003 8:39:51 AM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl
But we will have to spend years of time and much money to undo the brainwashing Babs did!
11 posted on 04/16/2003 8:40:00 AM PDT by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; Angelwood; tgslTakoma; sauropod; Jimmy Valentine's brother; BillF
What to wear, what to wear, to the White House Correspondent's Dinner?

Hmm, I'm thinking of my CNN paper bag over my head. Yes, that would be suitable for the occasion, with the proper shoes.
12 posted on 04/16/2003 8:41:08 AM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom


On Pierre Jennings.

Jenning is a HS dropout making him acceptable to ABC News


Jennings lies routinely about the USA when he is not giving out critical troop locations.
FREED IRAQI'S CHEERING CHAMPIONS OF FREEDOM WHO ARRIVED


Click picture for more Information


Near Baghdad, Iraq, heroic Marines secure a key bridge.
Could the wall be evidence of another Saddam/terrorist link to
Disney, ABC and Pierre Jennings? Inquiring minds want to know more.


So who (other than the AntiAmerican Disney and ABC) likes Jennings?

Terrorist Ashwari and Terrorist (and serial murderer of Americans and children) Abu Arafat:
"In our opinion, the best reporter on American foreign policy is
our beloved Canadian Abu Jennings,
who took the time to sleep with us.
Like us, he hates America. He is a Canadian Palestinian."

13 posted on 04/16/2003 8:41:48 AM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
Hollywood is simply reacting how a child reacts when they have been demonstably proven wrong. They were wrong, and Bush was right. It is just that simple and they can't deal with it, so they are throwing a temper tantrum.
14 posted on 04/16/2003 8:42:14 AM PDT by week 71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
DEPORT PETER JENNINGS!! SEND HIM BACK TO CANADA, Eh!
15 posted on 04/16/2003 8:43:04 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (It's not nice to fool Mr. Rumsfeld!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
The celebs problem and the problem of all those who express an opinion different from the prevailing wisdom is celebs insist that they are the righteous voices and you had better listen and change your attitude. I heard a protester on the tube state that his opinion was reaching people with closed minds and it was his duty to enlighten them.

THAT is why the celebs are a royal pain. Not because they protest, not because they have the media to use as their personal communications, but because they actually believe that because they think it, it is the ONLY way to think.

Hypocrites, liars, pompous useful idiots all....

You couldn't tie me a seat to watch Sarandon. The indignation of these fools is the key to my absolute loathing of them.
16 posted on 04/16/2003 8:43:34 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Using pretentious arcane words to buttress your argument means you don't have one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
dirtboy is dead-on.

Why is when people exercise their freedom of choice about whose movie they will pay to see, or whose event they will attend, they are aggressive right-wingers??

Just because the Hollywood "elite" have freedom of speech doesn't mean that it's always wise to exercise it.
17 posted on 04/16/2003 8:43:38 AM PDT by Gefreiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
NO one is stopping them from talking. They can rant on and on. We'll just keep REACTING. It's up to them to decide if what they say is worth what they lose.
18 posted on 04/16/2003 8:43:46 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
Because these particular outlets are still liberal. No mention yet on the teaser website: http://abcnews.go.com/Sections/WNT/
19 posted on 04/16/2003 8:44:24 AM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
Like I care what Pierre Jennings thinks. His newscast sucks, I never watch it.
20 posted on 04/16/2003 8:44:30 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson