Posted on 04/16/2003 5:46:09 PM PDT by FreeTheHostages
Please don't throw me in that thar briar patch...
It's been interesting to watch your growth over the years, Kristinn. You've really reached your stride as a conservative activist, not to detract from Angelwood and the other DC commandos.
The Robbins standard punch also known as "The French method"
1. Put back of hand on shoulder (palm facing sky)
2.curl fingers at tips without making a fist
3. Raise and turn elbow approx.90 degrees to your right while twisting torso slightly to your right as well
5. Tilt head back and stick out your chest
6. Move your chest towards your opponent with your "fist" following second. Keep legs perfectly straight and feet still.
7. All in one motion, swing elbow left extend arm and flip wrist downwards while jutting out your chin saying nyah like your angry
What's the use of having the worlds strongest military if you won't use it to help mankind and stop human suffering?
You would rather let our enemies fester untill they are powerfull enough to destroy America?
Bush has ended decades of oppresion and tyrrany, something Clinton never even came close to doing.
You know, the Soviet union tried to close it's doors to the rest of the world, and that worked real well for them, didn't it?
In 1993, terrorists bombed the World Trade Center. Their aim was to knock one tower into the other, bringing them both down. They mixed chemicals into the bomb that they believed would produce cyanide gas, so that rescuers and survivors of the initial blast would choke and suffocate. Had things gone according to plan for them, 50,000 casualties would have been the minimum we could expect.
In 2001, terrorists again targeted the towers. This time they succeeded. Again, had things gone according to plan, they might have killed as many as 50,000 people. Remember that on the evening of the attack Rudy Giuliani said that there might be as many as 20,000 dead, and he knew as much at that moment as anybody did about how wonderfully the FDNY had done their job.
So that's the bottom line. In the last ten years, terrorists twice tried to kill 50,000 of us in one day, but for some reason you believe that dealing with this problem is not a proper national security interest. If you really want to argue that we should not pre-empt those who would kill thousands of us, or that we have no right to deal with those who kill Americans if the victims happen to be outside our borders at the time, feel free. It will only help the Darwin Award committee give you your deserved prize with due speed. However, you have no grounds for your charges of hypocrisy against those of us who support the war against Jihadistan, so please refrain from making them in the future. We don't believe the Constitution is a suicide pact. You do. The fact that you think that makes you a better American than the rest of us is infinitely pathetic.
He certainly would. See post 126, I think you'll like it.
If that was an attempt at wit, fire your joke writer.
If I have inferred feelings and thoughts you don't have (which is unlikely) I did no worse than you did when you decided that the FR community enjoys making people dead when a Republican is in office and turns into Kumbaya pacifists when a Democrat is in office. Why does FR need introspection when we have Greybird?
You have spouted slanderous accusations and proposed we ignore a movement whose adherents have twice tried to kill 50,000 Americans in one day. I propose you either get extroverted and defend your negligence-as-foreign-policy views, or get introverted and shut up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.