Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Pole portrayal gets the cold shoulder (from real the ice bound doctor)
The Edmonton Journal ^ | Liane Faulder

Posted on 04/22/2003 3:58:04 AM PDT by Zacs Mom

EDMONTON - It's hard to imagine feeling let down when Oscar-winning actress Susan Sarandon is playing your character in a movie. But that's how Ice Bound reacts to her portrayal in the new tele movie, Ice Bound.

"I'm disappointed," says the 51-year-old doctor famous for the diagnosis and treatment of her own breast cancer while at the South Pole in 1999. "I wish they would have met me. I think it would have been nice to have had a chance to have them know me before they wrote about me or tried to play me."

Based on the book Nielsen wrote about her experience, Ice Bound starts as Nielsen (Sarandon) arrives at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station on Antarctica, one of the coldest and most remote places on Earth. Nielsen had agreed to spend a year taking care of the health of staff at the research centre, which is cut off from the rest of the world in the winter when it's too cold for planes to operate.

But when she discovered a fast-growing lump in her breast, roles at the Pole were reversed. The doctor had to rely on fellow "Polies" to keep her healthy. With no medical background, co-workers learned how to administer Nielsen's chemotherapy until a rescue flight could safely carry her back to the United States.

Nielsen lost a breast to cancer, but gained a circle of friends who remain close more than three years later. Nielsen says that's what makes it hard to accept the movie, which portrays her as a distant and dour character who doesn't much like the Pole once she gets there. Nothing could be further from her actual experience, she says.

"I knew I had finally found a society that I fit in and I was totally at home and I made the greatest friends of my life," recalls Nielsen, who shared her story with Edmontonians last year during her Unique Lives lecture at the Winspear Centre.

Nielsen went from feeling like an outsider most of her life to knowing she belonged. She's not exactly sure why she felt so comfortable in a place most would find a challenge to sheer survival.

"Maybe it was the morals of the group, the concept of duty and responsibility, our ideas of honour and friendship," she says. "Women were allowed to grow there and be whole people. We weren't judged by our appearance or by external weird stuff that's meaningless."

In the movie, Sarandon is seen as a woman who had fled problems all her life. Nielsen insists she wasn't running from anything when she decided to tackle the South Pole, unless boredom counts.

"We're all trying to change our lives in some way. I was leaving a flat line, a grey life that had developed because I was middle-aged."

At the top of her profession, she knew her choices were to sit around doing the same thing until she retired, or try something new. Though she refuses to talk about her family situation -- a nasty and very public lawsuit between her and her ex-husband erupted after her book came out in 2001 -- she insists the South Pole was adventure, not therapy.

"I'd had disappointments in my life, but my attitude is not that you run, but that you go towards something positive and you go after your dreams."

The doctor understands why the film's creators needed to make her character initially unpleasant. They needed a story arc, a place for the character to go.

"They wanted me to change," she says. "I did change spiritually, but you can't see that on the outside and it's hard to show that in a quick movie."

Nielsen thinks there's another reason why moviemakers had to give her a different motivation than the one that truly took her to the Pole.

"They can't imagine that a middle-aged, dumpy, professional woman from the hinterlands would suddenly decide to have an extreme adventure. They think something has to be behind it. What's behind it is a little girl with a goal who has always had dreams and there's lots of us out there."

lfaulder@thejournal.canwest.com

© Copyright 2003 Edmonton Journal


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamerican; antiwar; antiwarprotesters; cold; fabrications; hollywood; petroskey; protest; protester; protesters; sarandon
hmmmmmmmmm ~ Sarandon involved in a project that didn't bother to get it right.....
1 posted on 04/22/2003 3:58:04 AM PDT by Zacs Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
There's Hollywood again -- don't confuse me with the facts... "the character is a composite meant to represent every woman's struggle"... can't you just hear it now?
2 posted on 04/22/2003 4:16:46 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
I think it's typical of the Hollywierd crowd to have the arrogance to decide how a person's life should be interpreted. They always believe now, that their way of looking at life is correct. We, the great unwashed, could not possibly understand art at the levels that they do.
3 posted on 04/22/2003 4:24:58 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Let's all remember this the next time we see a Hollywood movie starting on TV with the phrase, "based on a true story." It's like buying expensive jewelry from a guy on the street who assures you that the ring he's selling you is based on the idea of a real diamond.
4 posted on 04/22/2003 4:34:42 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell
I tried to use the screen name Billhillarygoremcauliffeliebermanetalwillrotinhell but they wouldn't let me. Said it wasn't specific enough. :)

I like yours though.

5 posted on 04/22/2003 4:42:40 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom

Dr. Jerri Nielsen

Dr. Nielsen had better be careful, Sarandon's lover boy, Tim Robbins, doesn't take kindly to criticism of his little Susan.

6 posted on 04/22/2003 4:45:26 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
It's a shame, the book was quite interesting.
7 posted on 04/22/2003 4:53:08 AM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
Well, the subject and the audience disliked the film, but CBS and Sarandon liked it, so they consider it a success. (I wish CBS and Sarandon many similar "successes".)
8 posted on 04/22/2003 4:56:03 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
Oh, I see............she wanted accuracy in the portrayal of her experience. Got it.

Well, sweetie, you should've known better than to expect Hollywood to give a damn about trivial things like "facts" or "reality".

9 posted on 04/22/2003 4:59:22 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
Actually the South Pole story was intensely interesting (not Sarandon). I can only ascribe the historically low ratings to hatred for the forgetable washed up Sarandon.

I actually met Robbins and Sarandon at a Museum once. I complimented Robbins on his performance in Jacob's Ladder. Robbins is very tall, goofy, and psychologically enslaved/dependent on the short, ugly, domineering Sarandon, who looks hideous without make-up.

10 posted on 04/22/2003 6:05:51 AM PDT by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
One problem is it was trying to compete against the movie "Helen of Troy", plus I believe it came on at the same time as The Man Show.

Girls jumping on Trampolines trumps ugly old Sarandon any day.
11 posted on 04/22/2003 7:26:23 AM PDT by Chewbacca (My life is a Dilbert cartoon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
In the defense of the writers and producers, I think it is somewhat telling that this ladies companions at the time aren't exactly jumping to her defense and criticizing the production.
12 posted on 04/22/2003 7:34:29 AM PDT by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
Oh, I see............she wanted accuracy in the portrayal of her experience. Got it. Well, sweetie, you should've known better than to expect Hollywood to give a damn about trivial things like "facts" or "reality".
############################################################

The next time someone SELLS a story to the Networks for a movie, NEGOTIATE. A good Atty. would have gotten some editorial rights as well as casting considerations in addition to the money.
I heard all of the reasons it didn't do well. How much of that was as a direct result of the Peace flap?
PSST Hollywood, think who you are putting in these roles.
13 posted on 04/22/2003 8:28:08 AM PDT by YOMO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell
Let's all remember this the next time we see a Hollywood movie starting on TV with the phrase, "based on a true story."

That phrase is almost never used anymore. It has been replaced by the phrase, "inspired by actual events."

This allows the writers to take creative liberties and also frees Hollywood from having to pay and obtain permission from the person whose story is being told.

14 posted on 04/22/2003 6:39:29 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson