Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tim Robbins doesn't get it
San Diegom Union Trinune | April 22, 2003 | Joseph Perkins

Posted on 04/22/2003 11:02:32 AM PDT by faithincowboys

The Hollywood lefty thought he could take to the streets against his country – even as American troops were in harm's way in Iraq – and suffer no public backlash.

He was wrong.

Last week, the baseball hall of Fame in Cooperstown, N.Y., withdrew an invitation to the C-list actor and his wife, er, live-in partner, Susan Sarandon, to appear at an event marking the 15th anniversary of the film "Bull Durham."

Hall of Fame President Dale Petroskey was concerned, rightfully so, that the activist couple would use the event as a backdrop to further criticize the war and bash the nation's commander in chief. (Not unlike lefty director Michael Moore's boorish rant at the recent Academy Awards.)

"Mr. Robbins and Ms. Sarandon have every right to express their opinions," he stated. "But the Baseball Hall of Fame is not the the proper venue for highly charged political expressions, whatever they may be."

Robbins threw a hissy fit. How dare Petroskey disinvite him and his wife, er, significant other, just because of their anti-war activism. It was an affront to the quisling couple's "constitutionally guaranteed rights."

Well, sure, the First Amendment guarantees Robbins the right to free speech, to hate on his country (which is viewed as a "rogue state," he said this week) and its duly elected president. Even during time of war.

But the Constitution hardly immunizes Robbins from the consequences of his free speech. Since he chose to publicly oppose the war – which is supported by eight of 10 Americans, according to a recent ABC News/Washington Post poll – he should be prepared to accept the public backlash.

So what that he was blown off by baseball's Hall of Fame (much as Sarandon recently was dissed by the United Way in Tampa Bay, Fla.)? That's the price they pay, and rightfully so, for their unpatriotic activism.

Robbins, Sarandon and their fellow Hollywood lefties need to understand that the rules have changed since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. The American people no longer are willing to give them a free pass for comments, for actions that border on sedition.

I, for one, will never pay to see another movie featuring Robbins, Sarandon or any other outspoken anti-war actor. Not even at matinee prices. Nor will I purchase another CD by any outspoken anti-war musical artist.

And I am not alone. Millions of Americans have had it with the anti-American sentiments of the entertainment industry. And they are punishing the biggest offending "artists" at that box office, in the Nielsens and on the Billboard charts.

Like actor Sean Penn, who recently whined that his anti-war activism cost him a promised role in a coming film titled "Why Men Shouldn't Marry." He accused the film's producer, Stanley Bing, of "borrowing a page from the dark era of Hollywood blacklisting."

But why should Bing or any other producer jeopardize the financial success of a film project by casting an actor, like Penn, who has turned off so many potential filmgoers with his anti-American conduct?

Same goes for Janeane Garofalo. ABC has been developing a sitcom with the anti-war comedienne in which she reportedly plays a producer for a TV newsmagazine program.

The only way the show, titled "Slice O' Life," will generate more than token ratings, will last more than a few episodes, is if Garofalo makes good on her recent promise to Fox's Bill O'Reilly. That is: if the Iraqi people welcomed U.S. troops, if troops found "all kinds of bad, bad stuff" in Iraq, she would "go to the White House on my knees on cut glass and say, 'Hey, you were right, I shouldn't have doubted you.' "

Well get those knees ready, girlfriend.

Then there are the Dixie Chicks. Lead singer Natalie Maines told a London audience last month that the country music trio was embarrassed that President Bush hails from their home state of Texas.

Now the Chicks are crying that people who support America's commander in chief are being really, really mean to them. "We've gotten a lot of hate mail, a lot of threatening mail," complained Martie Maguire, adding that fellow Chick Emily Robison "had the front gate of her ranch smashed in."

Meanwhile, country music fans, most of whom happen to be quite patriotic, continue to boycott the Bush-bashing trio. Their current CD, titled "Home," sold a mere 51,000 copies last week, less than half as many as it sold the week after the group's verbal blast against the president.

It's about time that the American people started to hold left-wing entertainers accountable for their words and deeds.

And if Robbins and Sarandon, Penn and Garofalo and Maines, Maguire and Robison can't stand the backlash, they should concentrate on their acting and singing and keep their cockeyed political views to themselves.

Perkins can be reached via e-mail at joseph.perkins@uniontrib.com.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamerican; appeasers; baathistboytoy; baathistbozo; haters; hollywoodidiots; leftcoasttoast; liberalloons; saddamsslut; timrobbins; timsarandon; tinytim; tyrantstimbo; wimp

1 posted on 04/22/2003 11:02:32 AM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
Joseph Perkins appears to be an African-american conservative, or maybe, just the anti-Michael Eric Dyson. Perkins, irrespective of his party ID, gets it! He loves his country, and he doesn't want the boys and girls in the American armed forces to have to be burdened by the patholgy of the protesters.

Good job, Mr. Perkins!
2 posted on 04/22/2003 11:09:05 AM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
Millions of Americans have had it with the anti-American sentiments of the entertainment industry. And they are punishing the biggest offending "artists" at that box office, in the Nielsens and on the Billboard charts.

What these spoiled idiots can't understand is that their right to "constitutional free speech" is being upheld. They can say anything they want. But millions of "little people" also have that same right, and can react with their dollars. This is NOT the government bringing penalties on them, it's all those little people who have the same rights to their opinions and don't happen to agree with them. It's called freedom of expression, both vocally and economically.

Someone should tell them that this is post-Viet Nam, when the media was tightly controlled by left-wingers only. Now there's cable and the internet. Tough luck.

3 posted on 04/22/2003 11:11:24 AM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys; Sidebar Moderator
Gee. Same title. Posted last week. Let someone know if you need help using the SEARCH feature before posting a new thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/895913/posts
4 posted on 04/22/2003 11:14:50 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
Suggestion for all. Read:

Reagan's War: The Epic Story of His Forty Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism by Peter Schweizer.

This Hollyweird communistic sympathizer stuff goes way back. Way back.
5 posted on 04/22/2003 11:15:05 AM PDT by gipper81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xJones
"Well get those knees ready, girlfriend. "
__________________________________

Hahaha. Like she's never been on her knees before.
6 posted on 04/22/2003 11:16:45 AM PDT by fml (freedom begins with W!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gipper81
I picked this book up about a month ago and have just started reading. Good stuff !
7 posted on 04/22/2003 11:24:18 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
How is MCI doing with Danny Glover as spokesman?
8 posted on 04/22/2003 11:28:59 AM PDT by budanski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Ok, it was new to me. Your name is no lie-- the Jihad seems to not discriminate!
9 posted on 04/22/2003 11:31:40 AM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gipper81
Brilliant book. Wonder why Katie Couric never showcases it on her liberal morning show? I guess the question answers itself. The book gives Reagan the credit he so deserves and evicerates the fifth-column left. A great book indeed!
10 posted on 04/22/2003 11:33:38 AM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
Mr. Perkins: An addendum to your article: Mr. Petrofskey apologized to Timbo Robbins, which really caused some heartburn to patriotic Americans. Otherwise, good article.
11 posted on 04/22/2003 11:33:46 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
He didn't apologize for what he did...he only apologized for NOT phoning them first to inform them of his decision but...he said he STOOD BY HIS DECISION.
12 posted on 04/22/2003 11:44:40 AM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
"Kneepads Ms. Garofalo? Third aisle, on your right."
13 posted on 04/22/2003 11:45:46 AM PDT by ricpic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
yeah, but only for not calling them personally. He doesn't regret that he canceled the event. I agree with you, i wouldn't have given Timbo Sarandon and his nag the satisfaction of an apology.

When do they apologize? Never, they just put salt in the Nation's wounds.

We need not worry, the blowback is going to make that "chill wind" seem pleasant!
14 posted on 04/22/2003 11:50:00 AM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
Petrovsky removed the possibility that Sarandon and Robbins would use the HOF as another (inappropriate) soapbox to take jabs at the policies of the Bush Administration.

Robbins threw a hissy fit.

This tells me that Robbins was in the midst of polishing up another bomb he was hoping to detonate before he got word that he won't get to do it!

15 posted on 04/22/2003 11:58:12 AM PDT by Wondervixen (Ask for her by name--Accept no substitutes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Could someone point out where only actors have freedom of speech?


16 posted on 04/22/2003 11:59:54 AM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Liberate Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, NK, Cuba...; Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson