Why isn't anyone talking about boycotting "Made in Vermont" maple syrup? With Pat Leahy and Jumpin' Jim as Senators, they must be FRENCH!
1 posted on
05/04/2003 7:29:27 PM PDT by
dgallo51
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: dgallo51
I have been boycotting Vermont maple syrup since Jumpin' Jim Jeffords jumped! Would hate to have Leahy and Jeffords as my two Senators! UGH!
2 posted on
05/04/2003 7:31:39 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
To: dgallo51
that the nation's children and grandchildren will eventually have to pay back.It was only a few years ago they were talkiing about hhow to use the surplus! All this talk about the long-term is nonsense. The only that that is certain is that the social security system cannot continue on its present basis.
4 posted on
05/04/2003 7:34:40 PM PDT by
RobbyS
To: dgallo51
It's time to trade Vermont for Alberta.
To: dgallo51
It's called "leadership", Jumping Jim, not "pushing too hard". But then, you wouldn't be able to recognize it as such anyway.
6 posted on
05/04/2003 7:39:00 PM PDT by
exit82
To: dgallo51
Juck Feffords.
To: dgallo51
Reuters is a joke. We're not "FINANCING TAX CUTS WITH DEBT", as they say, we're financing government spending with debt. Any moron who understands where taxes come from and where spending comes from understands the difference. Mental pygmies.
8 posted on
05/04/2003 7:46:40 PM PDT by
tomahawk
To: dgallo51
I wonder if the management at the local stores have arguments about how they're going to "pay for" a sale? After all, if the company normally sells 100 widgets/day for $100 and it cuts the price to $80 for a week, it will lose at least $2,000/day, and possibly much more if people decide to buy more than the usual number of widgets.
9 posted on
05/04/2003 7:47:17 PM PDT by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: dgallo51
BTW, why does nobody ask if the country can afford to keep sending so much money to Washington?
10 posted on
05/04/2003 7:48:00 PM PDT by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: dgallo51
Jeffords jumped because he finally figured out that the Republican party was no longer the party of snotty rich liberals as opposed to the Democratic party which is the party of snotty middle class and poor liberals. He apparently missed the whole "A Choice, Not an Echo", Goldwater era and the Reagan Revolution.
11 posted on
05/04/2003 7:50:58 PM PDT by
dwswager
To: dgallo51
I'd like to tell Mr. Jeffords what he can push too hard...
To: dgallo51
Remember this, if you used the accounting practices of the US Government, you would be serving time for multiple felonies.
I just wish once some on say, budget, start from scratch, no base line, and do a real effing budget.
16 posted on
05/04/2003 8:13:35 PM PDT by
dts32041
(The power to tax, once conceded, has no limits; it continues until it destroys.- RAH)
To: dgallo51
When a liberal attacks Bush, it shows up as a Reuters "news" story. When a liberal speaks out on anything, it shows up as a Reuters "news" story. When liberals lie, cheat, steal, beat their wives, take bribes, get sloshed in public, impregnate teenaged girls, sell nuclear secrets, commit rape, wave their plumbing at their employees, stick a cigar where the sun don't shine or incinerate a church, the story will be suppressed in Reuters.
I theeenk there is a pattern here.
17 posted on
05/04/2003 8:14:16 PM PDT by
T'wit
To: dgallo51
If we would have had all the tax cuts in 2000 we would be out of this sorry mess. Did you hear that Liberal Republicans.
To: dgallo51; Joy Angela; conservogirl; Ragtime Cowgirl; Luis Gonzalez
...TOP GUN BUSH is protecting US...
...both at Home and Abroad...
...like a TOP GUN should.
23 posted on
05/04/2003 8:22:39 PM PDT by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com)
To: dgallo51
He also said the deficits threatened to explode just as the baby boom generation, born from 1946 to 1964, begins to retire and draw on Social Security (news - web sites) and Medicare. Ohhhhh, you mean the same generation that gave us a $6 trillion deficit are now worried about a couple hundred billion. Stick a sock in it Jeffords. Tax cuts increase revenues. As long as you guys in the Senate don't gobble up the excess, we'll be fine. Pass the stinkin tax breaks and lets move on.
To: dgallo51
"If Republicans push too hard, you have what happened to us two years ago with Senator Jeffords leaving the party," the Iowa Republican said. He quickly added that he did not expect that to happen."
That type of thinking is how Iraq's people were raped, killed, tortured, starved, and imprisoned and other acts of extreme violence. --"Don't make waves" we were told.
If there are any Republicans that would jump because OUR money will be spent by US and not THEM, let them jump!!!
Now, to finish the article.
27 posted on
05/04/2003 8:24:34 PM PDT by
malia
To: dgallo51
Well my goodness! What nerve the President has trying to push his tax cuts in the Congress! You'd think he was trying to keep his promises to those who elected him or something! Geeze, I can see why such a thing would upset someone like that fraud Jeffords!
To: dgallo51
"FINANCING TAX CUTS WITH DEBT "
Sounds good to me. They have been funding WILD, EXCESSIVE spending with debt for years.
36 posted on
05/04/2003 9:21:36 PM PDT by
lawdude
To: dgallo51
Jeffords' idea of just the right "pressure" for tax cuts is to just pretend....he's offended that Bush really means to get those $*#&* tax cuts! What a moron Jeffords is. He definitely belongs in the French Democrat camp.
37 posted on
05/04/2003 9:25:42 PM PDT by
WaterDragon
(Only America has the moral authority and the resolve to lead the world in the 21st Century.)
To: dgallo51
The president is simply trying to ease the damage from the train wreck that will occur with our economy. The debt levels we are now facing will unfortunately drag us into a severe recession, if not a depression. It's not the president's fault. He's simply in the wrong place at the wrong time with respect to the economy.
38 posted on
05/04/2003 10:15:56 PM PDT by
Rockitz
(After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson