Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian Right Talks Of Bolting GOP In 2004??
NewsMax.com ^ | May 6, 2003 | Phil Brennan

Posted on 05/06/2003 12:18:50 PM PDT by joesnuffy

Christian Right Talks of Bolting GOP in 2004

Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com Tuesday, May 6, 2003

Leaders of the Christian right are thinking of bolting the Republican Party in 2004. Such a move would deal a severe blow to President Bush’s re-election effort.

Though Christian voters played a pivotal role in electing Bush in his razor-thin victory over Al Gore, NewsMax has learned that major figures in the evangelical movement, including James Dobson, are talking about withholding support from the Republican Party.

Conservative religious activists cite the latest insult: the Republican Party’s failure to rally behind Sen. Rick Santorum, whose comments about the upcoming Supreme Court case on consensual homosexual acts triggered a national firestorm.

With the left mounting a major battle to redefine marriage, pro-family leaders are worried that the White House and Beltway Republicans care little about this issue and other social issues.

"If Republican leaders cannot mount a vigorous defense of marriage, then pro-family voters perhaps should begin to reconsider their loyalty to the party," warned Ken Connors, president of Family Research Council and a close affiliate of Dobson’s Focus on the Family.

Along with other leaders of the politically powerful pro-family movement, Connors was appalled at the "muted defense" of Santorum, R-Pa., who has been under attack by the gay rights lobby and its liberal allies in the media and the Democrat party. That failure, Connors said ominously, raises the question whether the GOP is the best vehicle for resisting the Democrats' radical political agenda.

Connors recently wrote a scathing memo attacking the Republican leadership to pro-family leaders.

"Beyond a few tepid statements of personal support for Santorum, no prominent national GOP leader seems willing or able to mount a spirited, principled defense of marriage and family.

“The question naturally arises: have Republicans been so intimidated by the smear tactics of the homosexual lobby and its Democratic attack dogs that they are cowering in silence," he wrote.

Dobson: 'Where Are the Republicans?'

Dobson echoed these sentiments during a joint broadcast with Connors on his Focus on the Family radio broadcast.

"Where are the Republicans on this?" he fumed. "I’ve heard very, very little coming from Mark Racicot, the Republican national chairman, or from the White House or from anybody else."

Dobson chastised the Republicans for getting too cozy with the gay lobby. He complained that Racicot met secretly with the homosexual group Human Rights Campaign but failed to disagree with it on the major issues. Connors said that Racicot didn’t utter one word in defense of marriage and failed to make the case that the Republican platform makes – that marriage should be limited to one man and one woman – he simply went with the message of so-called tolerance and inclusion.

Tolerance and inclusion aren’t the issues here – the issue is whether or not we’re going to radically redefine marriage, according to Connors.

Connors has written that HRC, "which desperately wants to marginalize pro-family Republicans, is exploiting the meeting to suggest the GOP is open to its political agenda. Surely someone as savvy as Mark Racicot, a former governor who was seriously considered as President Bush's running mate, was aware of the propaganda value in his meeting with HRC."

The Rev. Louis P. Sheldon of Traditional Values Coalition was also angered by Racicot's meeting with HRC. He warned that "this has caused concern among conservatives that Republican leaders are going to sell out on the issue of homosexuality."

Dobson worries that the Santorum controversy indicates the Republican Party’s weak commitment to social issues. He said: "And now that one of the most articulate defenders of family values in the Congress is under attack, Republicans are hiding under a bush somewhere. The lack of courage is amazing."

Ready to Stay Home in '04

How much does the GOP's increasing timidity on family issues threaten the party's future? Mike Farris, chairman and general counsel of Home School Legal Defense Association and one of the leading pro-family activists on Capitol Hill, told NewsMax.com: "Nobody who cares about these issues is going to go the Democrat party … this is a question of enthusiasm versus inactivity. Enthusiasm is going to wane if there’s not solid support for the fundamental principles that this nation was founded on."

It is only "smart politics to always remember to take care of your base. You don’t ever want to alienate your base,” said Farris, an ordained minister and father of 10 who is is president and professor of government at Patrick Henry College.

Farris, who has close ties to the White House, blamed the problem on GOP stupidity. “We’ve been doing a lot of things smart as Republicans, but ignoring Rick Santorum when he needs public reaffirmation is just stupid politics and it will hurt,” he said.

Schlafly Upset

Famed and influential activist Phyllis Schlafly, who single-handedly took down the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s, told NewsMax.com she was disturbed by the Republicans' failure to rally around Santorum. She called the administration’s defense of the Pennsylvania Republican "pretty limp" and "most cowardly.”

"There’s no reason for Santorum to apologize or back off. What he said was almost word for word what Justice Byron White said in his Supreme Court opinion in the previous gay rights case a number of years ago,” Schlafly said.

“I think the party and the administration’s statements are pretty generally recognized as weak-kneed and that they’re not backing up the constituency that elected George Bush. I think they’ll pay a price for that."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christianactivists; christianright; familyresearch; gop; gwb2004; homosexualagenda; humanrightscampaign; jamesdobson; markracicot; michaelfarris; mikefarris; profamily; rnc; santorum; traditionalvalues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 601-618 next last

1 posted on 05/06/2003 12:18:50 PM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Now boy's, lets not throw out the baby with the bath water.
2 posted on 05/06/2003 12:21:01 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL!

I guess Newsmax has to beat a dead horse(the now dead Santorum "controversy") to keep up internet hits.

3 posted on 05/06/2003 12:21:59 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Rubbish!
4 posted on 05/06/2003 12:21:59 PM PDT by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
ping.
5 posted on 05/06/2003 12:22:47 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Same ole same o. As they did in 2000, 1996, 1992, 1988........get my drift?
6 posted on 05/06/2003 12:22:52 PM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Get A Life, Leave the Masons Alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Oh yeah, guys, that'd be a REAL good idea. That's it...delight Hitlery and her henchmen in the Senate even more!!

Such a move would be idiotic to the nth degree, and I don't believe any leader worth his or her salt would do it.

7 posted on 05/06/2003 12:22:54 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm SO glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big bad easter bunny
Democrat wannabes can Dream On!
8 posted on 05/06/2003 12:23:21 PM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
So two "evangelicals" think they can deliver the whole base?

Really?

What do they do? Stand in the booth with them and offer them walk around money?

Phooey. Two men don't a movement make.
9 posted on 05/06/2003 12:23:24 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Leaders of the Christian right are thinking of bolting the Republican Party in 2004.

ROTFLMAO! I'm sooooo sure. We have a "born again" President, but they're willing to help elect a representative of Lucifer(Demoncrat), I don't think so, they're just posturing.

10 posted on 05/06/2003 12:23:27 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
The enemy of the good is the insistence upon the perfect. If religious conservatives insist on bolting the party, they'll see all their worst nightmares come true. If you're happy with what Republicans are doing on values, work within the party to change it. But remember if you help to elect Democrats you'll be effectively undoing all the hard work it took conservatives to get to where we are now. The destructive legacy of liberalism is not going to be reversed overnight. It'll take a lot longer than 10 years to dismantle it. What needs to be emphasized is the Democrats are the party of libertinism, moral relativism, and abortion. Think about it before foolishly talking about deserting the GOP cause it hasn't done everything you wanted to do.
11 posted on 05/06/2003 12:23:51 PM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Ain't gonna happen. If some crackpot in the "Christian Right" thinks he/she is speaking for all of us, guess what? They will make a fool of themselves.

Message to leaders in the "Christian Right", the Christian Coalition, et al: I can speak for myself, thank you!

12 posted on 05/06/2003 12:24:00 PM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Bad idea.
13 posted on 05/06/2003 12:24:01 PM PDT by wardaddy (I know you rider, gonna miss me when I'm gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
There is no worry about conservatives leaving the Bush train. Now cracked-brained idiots might.
14 posted on 05/06/2003 12:24:07 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Damned if we do, damned if we don't ping.
15 posted on 05/06/2003 12:24:37 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
According to the reports I saw, turnout among evangelicals was poor in 2000 compared with earlier elections. It was the main reason Bush almost lost.
16 posted on 05/06/2003 12:24:45 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Really!

Wishful thinking here on somebody's part.

17 posted on 05/06/2003 12:25:00 PM PDT by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
If this is true, and the pro-2nd Amendment group do the same thing because of the administration's support of continuing the Feinstein/Schumer assault weapon ban, this could mean trouble.
18 posted on 05/06/2003 12:25:04 PM PDT by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
We should at least be open to the possibility that the DOMESTIC LEFT as well as OVERSEAS ANTI WESTERN AND ANTI US ENEMIES long ago figured out that by splintering the Right they could neutralize us. Therefore, I would imagine that they have invested in operatives who, on the surface appear to be part of the various Rightist groups. I would imagine that the ones who have been planted amongst the "Religious Right" help to facilitate discussions such as the one that has led to the statements documented in the article. Meanwhile, I would also imagine that within the "big tent" group of Moderates are other operatives who facilitate 3rd Way approaches.
19 posted on 05/06/2003 12:25:04 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Appeasement for parishioners. All smoke.
20 posted on 05/06/2003 12:25:12 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 601-618 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson