UPDATE: OBSTRUCTION DAY RALLY - Fri. 5/9/03 Noon - Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist Announcement

May 8, 2003 | Angelwood

[W04Man]

Here is a pic of the FReep today taken by (forgot his FR name)(Grant)

Here is a link to some other photos: http://w-04.com/ObstructionDay1/index.htm

[W04Man]

Oh, I forgot, I got a very short clip on CNN with Sen Fritz. Also, C-Span has the digital verions of the whole speech on their web site at http://c-span.org

[Angelwood]

Your pictures look great, though they don't show how soaked some of us were getting by the end of the rally. Your sign was nice a prominent and easy to read. They didn't zoom in on the signs though. Thanks for holding up my sign for so long. I know it is difficult and tiring to hold two signs for long, especially with one held above your head.

I was out this evening and might try to do an after-action report tomorrow with your pictures. There were a total of 9 FReepers and Lurkers in attendance. The DC Chapter brought the only signs, though another man brought stickers.

Thank you again.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

[votelife]

Dear President Bush, With the Surpeme Court session getting ready to close, it may well be time for perhaps the most important domestic decision of your presidency: the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice(s). The main reason why I supported you in 2000 and why I wanted Daschle out of power in 02 (and 04) has to do with the courts. I want America courts to interpret law, not write law. During your presidential campaign you said Thomas and Scalia were your two model justices. Those are excellent models. The High Court needs more like them. Clarence Thomas recently said to students that the tough cases were when what he wanted to do was different from what the law said. And he goes by the law. This should be a model philosophy for our justices. Your father, President Bush lost his reelection campaign for 3 main reasosn, as far as I can see. 1. he broke the no new taxes pledge 2. David Souter 3. Clinton convinced people we were in a Bush recession (which we had already come out of by the time Clinton was getting sworn in)

I urge you to learn from all three of these: 1. on taxes, you're doing great. Awesome job on the tax cut. 2. good job so far on judicial appointments. I want to see more of a fight for Estrada, Owen, and Pickering, but I commend you on your nominations. 3. by staying engaged in the economic debate you'll serve yourself well

I have been thoroughly impressed with your handling of al Queida, Iraq, and terrorism. You have inspired confidence and have shown great leadership.

But I want to remind you that your Supreme Court pick(s) will be with us LONG after you have departed office. I urge you to avoid the tempation to find a "compromise" pick. Go for a Scalia or Thomas. Don't go for an O'Connor or Kennedy. To be specific, get someone who is pro-life. Roe v Wade is one of the worst court decisions I know of, and it's the perfect example of unrestrained judicial power.

I know the temptation will be tremendous on you to nominate a moderate. But remember who your true supporters are. I am not a important leader or politician. I am "simply" a citizen who has been an enthusiatic supporter of you. I am willing to accept compromise in many areas of government but I will watch your Court nomiantions extremely closely. What the Senate Dems are doing right now is disgusting, but as the President you have the bully pulpit to stop it. Democrats will back down if you turn up serious heat on them.

Moreover, I think public opinion is shifting towards the pro-life position. Dems will want you to nominate a moderate, but almost all will vote against you anyways. Pro-choice Repubs will likely still vote for you if you nominate a Scalia, after all, you campaigned on it. So Mr. President, I urge you to stick with your campaign statements and nominate justices who believe in judicial restraint, like Scalia and Thomas.

Happy Memorial Day and may God bless you and your family.