Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
There is no evidence, at least not from the article, that the gun was defective.

The defect, in this case, would be in the design. Like a car that would require the emergency brake to be released before starting, but still would start in drive or reverse. Starting it in gear would still be the operators fault, but the requirement for releasing the brake would amplify any negative results of doing so and be a contributory factor in any accidents. Had the saftey not been required to be off before unloading a loaded gun it would be entirely the operators fault.

46 posted on 05/10/2003 10:15:29 AM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: templar
"Weird!" None of my revolvers have a safety - they're always in "fire" mode. My DAO (double-action-only)9-mm Kel-tec works the same way. I've unloaded those guns many time, and never had an unintended discharge while unloading.
47 posted on 05/10/2003 10:26:18 AM PDT by Woodworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson