Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator
Totally bogus because they think the public doesn’t know any physics. Yes, black does absorb more radiation due to black’s higher emissivity, but due to the same emissivity, black also radiates more – sending atmospheric heat back out into space. (This is the same reason heatsinks are black – it helps them radiate heat)
7 posted on 05/13/2003 2:58:15 PM PDT by paulk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: paulk
That would be true in a vacuum, but in the atmosphere you've got conductivity to deal with.
9 posted on 05/13/2003 3:00:04 PM PDT by Eala (The Left's newest doublespeak: "We don't see it as a 'quota', we see it as a 'performance standard'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: paulk
There is a change of frequency before and after. The lower frequency emitted is absorbed and held by the atmosphere much better than the higher frequency as absorbed.
26 posted on 05/13/2003 5:53:36 PM PDT by RightWhale (Post no Bills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: paulk
That is right, but then the temp of the soot particles are higher.

However, the main reason for the climate change is due to the variation of the behavior of sun, not what we humans do or not do.
27 posted on 05/13/2003 10:25:35 PM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson