To: cogitator
Totally bogus because they think the public doesnt know any physics. Yes, black does absorb more radiation due to blacks higher emissivity, but due to the same emissivity, black also radiates more sending atmospheric heat back out into space. (This is the same reason heatsinks are black it helps them radiate heat)
7 posted on
05/13/2003 2:58:15 PM PDT by
paulk
To: paulk
That would be true in a vacuum, but in the atmosphere you've got conductivity to deal with.
9 posted on
05/13/2003 3:00:04 PM PDT by
Eala
(The Left's newest doublespeak: "We don't see it as a 'quota', we see it as a 'performance standard'")
To: paulk
There is a change of frequency before and after. The lower frequency emitted is absorbed and held by the atmosphere much better than the higher frequency as absorbed.
26 posted on
05/13/2003 5:53:36 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Post no Bills)
To: paulk
That is right, but then the temp of the soot particles are higher.
However, the main reason for the climate change is due to the variation of the behavior of sun, not what we humans do or not do.
27 posted on
05/13/2003 10:25:35 PM PDT by
AdmSmith
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson