Skip to comments.
DeLay: House Will Not Extend Assault Weapons Ban
Washington Post ^
| Tuesday, May 13, 2003; 6:00 PM
| Jim VandeHei
Posted on 05/13/2003 4:23:34 PM PDT by Remedy
The Republican-controlled House will not renew the federal ban on Uzis and other semiautomatic weapons, a key leader said today, dealing a significant blow to the campaign to clamp down on gun sales nationwide.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: awb; bang; sunsetprovision
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
05/13/2003 4:23:34 PM PDT
by
Remedy
To: Remedy
OK, so what's the strategy now?
2
posted on
05/13/2003 4:25:54 PM PDT
by
Archangelsk
(The price of freedom is high and a choice, if you can't accept that leave.)
To: Remedy
The ball is hiked, DeLay takes the ball, no wait, its a fake handoff, DeLay throws a nasty block, Bush heads for the endzone untouched. What a block!
3
posted on
05/13/2003 4:26:28 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: Archangelsk
Throw feces.
Throw a tantrum.
And get ignored.
That's the standard RAT posture for 2004, on any issue.
4
posted on
05/13/2003 4:27:04 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: Poohbah
Well, the RATS still have the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals... they're legislating from there.
5
posted on
05/13/2003 4:28:03 PM PDT
by
So Cal Rocket
(Free Miguel and Priscilla!)
To: Remedy
That's more like it....varmint!
6
posted on
05/13/2003 4:29:10 PM PDT
by
keithtoo
(!)
To: Remedy
Thank the Lord, now the President can work on the little stuff like taxes, unemployment, and the war on terrorists.
7
posted on
05/13/2003 4:29:22 PM PDT
by
bybybill
(first the public employees, next the fish and, finally, the children)
To: So Cal Rocket
One of these days, the Supremes will decide that they've had enough of the 9th, and forbid the 9th from issuing any rulings without a "mother-may-I" from the Supremes.
They did this in 1992, during the Robert Alton Harris farce.
8
posted on
05/13/2003 4:29:55 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: Remedy
Schumorlous and FineSwine will have their panties in a knot over this one. The fact is their is not enough support for extending the AWB in the Senate or the House.
Watch for democrats to try and sneak it into the Tax Cut Bill or some other legislation. I'm not sure if I was Tom Delay if I would have announced my plans this early, I would have waited for the Senate and if it was passed there, then announce that he would not schedule it for debate or even consideration at the last moment, that way these underhanded low life scum of the earth democrats couldn't pull the same old sh*t
9
posted on
05/13/2003 4:39:17 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(Freedom is Ringing)
To: Remedy; TLBSHOW
I wonder where the glass is half empty crowd is now that Delay said the AWB will not be extended. The other night when the NYT's said it was all but a done deal that Bush is in favor of extending the Bill and will most likely help his good buddy Sen. Schumer see this through to his desk, HAD IT ALL WRONG.
But I'm sure they will be here to swear Bush "would have" signed it, right along with that 245i Bill that never reached his desk. They just don't get it. When will they stop believing the NYT's?
10
posted on
05/13/2003 4:55:33 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(Freedom is Ringing)
To: Remedy
I just hope this isn't just to make us let our guard down.
To: Remedy
significant blow to the unconstitutional campaign to clamp down on gun sales nationwide.The main stream press is full of idiots that would have us believe that the 2nd doesn't mean what it says. They have some company at the 9th Circuit..
12
posted on
05/13/2003 4:58:08 PM PDT
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: MJY1288
Actually, I'm wondering if it was the right timing..In other words, send a message to some senate folks..fillibuster huh? Check out this pet project of yours...assuault weapon ban renewal...Did ya hear that? The sound of the toilet flushing?
To: unix
LOL, I didn't look at it that way, You might have a point. One thing the RATS in the Senate can be sure of.... "The Hammer" isn't bluffing. The "toilet flushing" is the best thing that could ever happen to the AWB
Thanks for the input, I like your view better :-)
14
posted on
05/13/2003 5:12:51 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(Freedom is Ringing)
To: Remedy
They also said Campaign Finance Reform would never come to a vote. This is not the same thing, but I wish the President had taken a more principled position on the matter. He has been the best President in history on the matter of the 2nd Amendent, and I don't see that it has hurt him. Quite the contrary, and I wish he'd stayed true to form on this.
I've always wanted a Heckler & Koch Model 91, with a flash suppresor and with a bayonet lug, and now I'll be able to get one.
I'll dedicate my first shots with it to Sarah Brady and Hillary Clinton :)
To: 45Auto
"AK-47 and 18 other types of semiautomatic weapons that were outlawed by Clinton and a Democratic-controlled Congress a decade ago would be legal again...
Talking about idiots... The NYT reporters don't even know which end of the gun is the muzzle let alone discussing about "assault weapon". It's absolutely bogus to claim fully automatic AK-47 rifle (
already ban by National Firearms Act of 1934) will be available if letting "assault weapon" ban sunset is intellectual dishonest!!!
Oops... forgot, this article is from the NY Times. SIGH!
16
posted on
05/13/2003 5:28:14 PM PDT
by
Toidylop
To: Batrachian
They also said Campaign Finance Reform would never come to a vote. ding ding ding.
I will wait and see whether Bush pulls a "I expect an extension of the AW ban on my desk for me to sign ..." before I consider this a done deal.
It has been this kind of pressure applied by the administration that has broken the will of the Republican controlled house on a number of occasions.
To: Remedy
We'll see. I like DeLay and I'd vote for him without a problem. I'm not worried about HIS vote.
Here's the problem though. The SINate Democraps are stopping the gun lawsuit ban. That could leave a bargaining chip open.
There's always a snake in the grass there somewhere. We just have to watch for it.
18
posted on
05/13/2003 5:46:08 PM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
("You are fined one credit for a violation of the verbal morality statute." - Demolition Man)
To: Toidylop
All gun laws, including the 1934 NFA, are unconstitutional; with each new gun law we take a step closer to tyranny, the destruction of the Constitution, and the end of the Republic. The enemies of freedom know this because it is their goal. Getting rid of the federal AW ban is much more than mere symbolism; it is a step towards freedom instead of away from it. Who are the enemies of freedom? Many are obvious, some are not. I watch who the most vocal, shrill, screechers are with respect to this law, and I make a mental note. Sadly, about half the US Senate fall into their ranks.
19
posted on
05/13/2003 5:50:35 PM PDT
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: Remedy
It Ain't Over
Until
The Fat Lady Sings!
Tom Delay might be wrong - you know.
20
posted on
05/13/2003 6:55:15 PM PDT
by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson