Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neandertals Not Our Ancestors, DNA Study Suggests (Whewww!!!)
National Geographic News ^ | 5/14/03 | Hillary Mayell

Posted on 05/14/2003 10:49:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
More Information About Human Origins



News Stories


Cannibalism Normal for Early Humans?


Neandertals Had Highly Capable Hands, Study Says


Did Neandertals Lack Smarts to Survive?


Java Skull Raises Questions on Human Family Tree


First Humans in Australia Dated to 50,000 Years Ago


1.8 Million-Year-Old Hominid Jaw Found


When Did "Modern" Behavior Emerge in Humans?


Documentary Redraws Human's Family Tree


Fossil Implies Our Early Kin Lived in Trees, Study Says


Controversy Over Famed Ancient Skull: Ape or Human?


Skull Fossil Opens Window Into Early Period of Human Origins


Skull Fossil Challenges Out-of-Africa Theory


New Study Supports Idea That Primates, Dinosaurs Coexisted


Human Fossil Adds Fuel to Evolution Debate


Did Our Species Mate With Other Human Species?


Did Humans and Neandertals Battle for Control of the Middle East?


Killer Cats Hunted Human Ancestors


Adolescence Came Late in Human Evolution, Study Shows


Viewpoint: Is It Time to Revise the System of Scientific Naming?


African Bone Tools Dispute Key Idea About Human Evolution


Africa's Imperiled Rock Art Documented Before it Disappears


Bones, Tools Push Back Human Settlement in Arctic Region


Oldest Asian Tools Show Early Human Tolerance of Variable Climate


Telltale Face Betrays Neandertals as Non-Human


Fossils From Ethiopia May Be Earliest Human Ancestor


New Face Added to Humankind's Family Tree


Discoveries Breathe New Life into Human Origins Debate

1 posted on 05/14/2003 10:49:30 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Evolution at its best: genocide.
2 posted on 05/14/2003 11:59:41 PM PDT by rmlew ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Don't worry humanists and atheists. You can still claim to have been accidentally formed from a blob of primoral mud.

Meanwhile, us God-fearing folk will continue celebrating that we were "fearfully and wonderfully" made by a Creator.

3 posted on 05/15/2003 12:21:54 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Just as well neanderthals arent around anymore. Can you imagine the affirmative action benefits they would get?
4 posted on 05/15/2003 12:25:10 AM PDT by Godel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godel
I remember seeing something about a collapsed roof cave dig ...

in sw Asia -- china that was hundred of thousands years old ---

that had all european skeletons in it ... all carbon dated too !


5 posted on 05/15/2003 12:38:17 AM PDT by f.Christian (( the VERY sick mind - won't recognize facts -- REALITY -- probability anymore ! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
What a load of rubbish. How on earth would they know they are European?
6 posted on 05/15/2003 4:50:00 AM PDT by Yaron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
My imaginary friend beats your imaginary friend anyday.
7 posted on 05/15/2003 4:52:18 AM PDT by Yaron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Godel
Just as well neanderthals arent around anymore

They're here. Today we call them DemocRATs. (e.g.: Klintons, Ellen Goodman, Teddy Kennedy, Robert Byrd-Brain, etc. etc. etc. etc.)

8 posted on 05/15/2003 5:06:59 AM PDT by LuisBasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yaron
How on earth would they know they are European?

They were wearing berets.

9 posted on 05/15/2003 5:11:00 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (V-Twin mind with a Moped modem....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
You can understand if the Neanderthal were French why the Cro-Magnan so easily took over.
10 posted on 05/15/2003 5:17:03 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Cheese eating surrender homonids.
11 posted on 05/15/2003 5:18:20 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (V-Twin mind with a Moped modem....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
I wonder how this news will make Mrs. CD feel. (She's a redhead)
;~)

Redheads 'are neanderthal'

12 posted on 05/15/2003 5:24:01 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LuisBasco
LOL! I was thinking the same thing. Too bad the mitochondrial rna didn't pan out: It would have explained a lot of things.
13 posted on 05/15/2003 6:01:16 AM PDT by Adder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
all carbon dated too !

Better check your sources. Carbon dating is good for only about 40,000 years. After that the remaining amounts of radioactive carbon become too small to measure. With some very sophisticated measuring equipment, maybe 50-60,000 years BP. Hence C14 dating for remains hundreds of thousand of years old is not possible. Other dating techniques for older fossils do not involve carbon.

14 posted on 05/15/2003 8:46:17 AM PDT by B.Bumbleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Our results add to the evidence collected previously in different fields, making the hypothesis of a 'Neandertal heritage' very unlikely," said Giorgio Bertorelle...

Doesn't that make the entire theory of evolution very unlikely? In other words, if we're not descended from neanderthals, then from what? Neanderthals and homo sapiens are the two basic species of human-like creatures we have evidence for; everything else is basically apes or ape-like creatures.

15 posted on 05/15/2003 9:50:44 AM PDT by martianagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaron
My imaginary friend beats your imaginary friend anyday.

Oh really? And how do you come to that conclusion?

16 posted on 05/15/2003 2:23:49 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: martianagent
One can explain the separate adn competing hominid species of H. Sapien Neanderthalis and H. Sapien Sapien(Cro-Magnon/Modern Humans) quite easily. They each spereately evolved from H. Erectus. Neanderthals left Africa first, Cro-Magnon came 80,000 years later. Cro-Magnon were smarter and more adaptable. Thus they out competed and/or killed off the Neanderthals.

This is hardly unique. Bonbos and Chimpanzees are the closest living relatives to humans. These great apes are virtually identical. However, Chimps are more competitive and will hunt for food. The Bonobos preffer a pure cegitarian diet and have a society built of sexual relations. Bonobos are dying out. Chimps survive.

17 posted on 05/15/2003 4:46:45 PM PDT by rmlew ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Bonobos are dying out.

They also sound a lot like the French!

18 posted on 05/15/2003 4:52:17 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
In my undergraduate years, I decided to take Geology, Anthropology and Archeology for my Science requirements. I enjoyed them very much; did a paper on dendrochronology which I thought was very interesting (evidently my professor agreed, he gave me an A).

One lecture I remember was about Neanderthal Man. The witticism tossed out by the lecturer stays with me today: "If a Neanderthal man were with us today, I suppose he would look just like Fred Flintstone."

19 posted on 05/15/2003 4:56:20 PM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
One can explain the separate adn competing hominid species of H. Sapien Neanderthalis and H. Sapien Sapien(Cro-Magnon/Modern Humans) quite easily. They each spereately evolved from H. Erectus.

Really? On a scale of one to ten with an ape being one and a human ten, the neanderthal would be about a nine, while home erectus would be about a six or a seven. If we can't be descended from neanderthals because they're too apelike, how are we descended from homo erectus which is even more apelike? Or did you think home erectus was just some gay guy with a hard on???

20 posted on 05/19/2003 7:50:31 AM PDT by martianagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson