Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They don't make leaders like Ike these days
Austin American-Statesman ^ | Friday, June 6, 2003 | Arnorled Garcia Jr.

Posted on 06/06/2003 8:06:53 AM PDT by af_vet_rr

Arnold Garcia Jr.
They don't make leaders like Ike these days
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Friday, June 6, 2003

Somewhere in the middle of the trainer's remarks about leadership, it occurred to me that the ultimate test of management skill is getting people to walk into bullets. And that made me think of Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Behind that farm boy smile was a determined, fiery-tempered leader who didn't hesitate to break eggs to make omelettes. Plucked from military obscurity, Eisenhower rode a rocket toward the top of the chain of command during World War II, and afterward, he just kept going. Historians can debate the merits of Eisenhower's presidency, but if you think about the general as a top manager and D-Day as his assignment, he easily makes the top 10 of anyone's leadership list.

Some of you recall firsthand that in the early days of the war, Allied victory was far from certain. The Germans occupied Europe and their Japanese allies ruled the Pacific. In the early stages of the war, the U.S. military was growing fast but struggling to find its footing. Although the North African campaign had started off with a disastrous defeat at Kasserine Pass, Eisenhower's leadership and a pinched German supply line turned the tables.

That he was chosen to lead the Allies was a combination of luck and political skill. Before World War II, Eisenhower's career path had been uneven. He was later to say that he had spent years in the Pacific learning dramatics from Douglas MacArthur. MacArthur returned the compliment by remarking that Eisenhower had been the best clerk who had ever served under him.

Eisenhower found a champion in George Marshall, the Army chief of staff, and after a series of intramural Allied political brawls, Eisenhower became Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force. His assignment was to plan and execute the invasion of the European mainland.

A successful ground invasion depended on air superiority. While Allied air crews wrested that superiority from a skilled, experienced and determined foe, D-Day planners began working on invasion scenarios. The object was to move troops, equipment and supplies across the channel, attack and destroy a fierce enemy dug in behind an impressive array of well-planned defenses and push inland. By the way, it had to be a surprise.

The movement had to be accomplished in the middle of night, and all that intricate choreography was at the mercy of the fickle European spring weather. Moreover, the beaches had to be taken and the move inland had to proceed by the end of the day. The fabled Erwin Rommel, commanding the German defenders, believed that it was imperative to repel the invasion in the first 24 hours, and this he was determined to do.

We remember today that the invasion was successful, but in the early morning hours of June 6, 1944, the outcome was far from certain. Realizing the millions of risks each individual detail and soldier presented, Eisenhower wrote a statement for release in the event the invasion failed.

"Our landings in the Cherbourg-Havre have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place was based upon the best information available. The troops, the air and the Navy did all that bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt, it is mine alone."

Fortunately for us all, Eisenhower never had to issue that statement, but it lingers in the wings of the history of this historic day. That terse, undelivered communiqué should be more than one of those historic "might have beens" or "what-ifs." It is a lesson in leadership that anyone responsible for more than his or her person should learn.

Eisenhower had a staff with the best of everything available to it, yet the decision to go was his. If the mission were a success, there would be plenty of accolades to go around. Failure would have been a different story.

Eisenhower was leader enough to be willing shoulder the blame alone. I thought about that lesson forged 59 years ago today as I sift through the news of corporate, political and personal failures and scandals.

You don't see many people caught up in those events stepping forward and facing the consequences squarely, even as you hear a lot about "accountability" and "accepting responsibility." Those words, though popular, are rendered hollow by "everybody does it" and "wasn't my fault" responses to adversity and setback.

For his skill, the late president and general again deserves our salute. For the willingness to accept responsibility, he deserves our respect.

agarcia@statesman.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dday; dwightdeisenhower; eisenhower; enron; leadership; nytimes; wwii
What more can you say. You hear a lot of talk about personal responsibility, but you don't see many examples of it, through all of the scandals that keep coming out, upto and including the NY Times.
1 posted on 06/06/2003 8:06:53 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
I like IKE.
2 posted on 06/06/2003 8:10:02 AM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Personal responsibility seems to have become an anachronism. For examples we need look no further than Clinton or Howell Raines.
3 posted on 06/06/2003 8:14:21 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
A solid general, but many believe that his broad front strategy - the result of his strategic conservatism as much as political concerns - probably lengthened the war by months.
4 posted on 06/06/2003 8:17:01 AM PDT by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iguana
On the other hand, a mass-conscript army has a very different skill set than an elite volunteer force. Ike may very well have correctly assessed the capabilities he had available, and proceded with the brute-force mass advance approach, using heavy artillery and air support.
5 posted on 06/06/2003 8:19:51 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Iguana
Hindsight is 20/20
6 posted on 06/06/2003 8:24:13 AM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Ike is one of my heroes! At my age, he is the first President that I was aware of as a kid. (I was born one month before D-Day)
7 posted on 06/06/2003 8:30:04 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Great post!
8 posted on 06/06/2003 8:33:17 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

9 posted on 06/06/2003 8:35:26 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Eisenhower's leadership and a pinched German supply line turned the tables.

Patton? Who's Patton. Never heard of him...
10 posted on 06/06/2003 8:38:32 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
No matter what the historians write about Ike, no one can doubt that he earned the position.
11 posted on 06/06/2003 8:39:16 AM PDT by fightu4it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Funny how when look at the Clintons or Raines, a lack of integrity seems to go hand-in-hand with a lack of responsibility.

General Eisenhower was willing to take responsibility if the invasions had failed. The scope of that and what failure would have meant is almost too hard to grasp, yet today, it's hard for somebody to take responsibility for losing millions or for cheating on their wives, or for covering up something like a bad journalist or a bad hiring or promotion policy.

12 posted on 06/06/2003 8:43:10 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fightu4it
No matter what the historians write about Ike, no one can doubt that he earned the position.

Agreed. His route on the way to the position was certainly an interesting one and he passed up many others who felt they should have had a shot, but once in the position he proved without a doubt that he was the man for the job. Perhaps it took the best clerk to have ever served under General MacArthur to fill the position ;-) There are some who want to bash him for being a bit to cautious, but they seem to forget just what the landings entailed and that he was facing Erwin Rommel.

13 posted on 06/06/2003 8:50:40 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fightu4it
I would politely ask you to read the book about Eisenhower titled "The Politician" and learn about just "how" Ike made his meteoric rise in the military, then see if those facts change your thoughts about whether Ike "earned" his military positions... While you're reading, check out Ike's decision to "repatriate" some POWs we held, sending them to their certain death. This was not the act of a great man, regardless of his record as POTUS.
14 posted on 06/06/2003 8:51:33 AM PDT by Patriot Son (Learn the truth, it beats ignorance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Patriot Son
Operation Keelhaul bump!
15 posted on 06/06/2003 9:25:16 AM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Patriot Son
I would politely ask you to read the book about Eisenhower titled "The Politician"

BUMP to that. Ijust came across this thread, and the first thing that came to mind was "Operation Keehaul". Read the book years ago. Mind blowing stuff!

The Politician by R. Welch

Belmont Publishing Company

FMCDH

16 posted on 06/06/2003 9:33:53 AM PDT by nothingnew (the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
In 1945, General Dwight Eisenhower ordered that "Operation Keelhaul" be put into effect. This involved rounding up and shipping back to "their countries of origin" ALL the refugees from communism: men, women and children, soldier or civilian, male or female — even though many of them had been fighting on OUR side during the war. Since all of Eastern Europe was then under Communist domination, sending these people back was, quite literally, a sentence of death, some by immediate execution and the rest by slow extermination from overwork and malnutrition in the Soviet slave labor camps in Siberia.

These people were rounded up at bayonet point, forced into freight cars and shipped off to a terrible fate. There was no accurate count kept but the MINIMUM figure was 2,000,000 people and a maximum of 5,000,000. The elimination of all these anti-Communist people made the Communist domination of Eastern Europe MUCH easier.

And the American people were kept blissfully unaware of this action which Eisenhower enforced rigidly, even though it violated international law, the laws of his own country and laws of humanity. Germans were prosecuted at Nuremberg for similar crimes but control of the news ensured that Eisenhower, and those under his command who took part in this outrage, were never even officially accused of wrong doing.

17 posted on 06/06/2003 9:42:54 AM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
For Patton it wasn't hindsight.

I'm not really knocking Ike the general - just pointing out his limits.

His abilities - to work with allies and contentious generals, to make hard strategic decisions, to marshal logistics - were formidable.

18 posted on 06/06/2003 1:13:50 PM PDT by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Iguana
His abilities - to work with allies and contentious generals, to make hard strategic decisions, to marshal logistics - were formidable.

contentious generals - I think that's a bit of an understatement.

19 posted on 06/06/2003 2:03:55 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson