[LasVegasMac]

Just curious, why the LOL?

Obviously, I don't agree with the empire theme. The last paragragh, though, has a very valid point - and brings to light one of our major failings in dealing with the rest of this planet. IMHO.

If Saddam's overthrow marks the beginning of a sustained attempt to build peace in the Middle East, we will have cause to celebrate the advent of this American empire. But if Iraq is just another ephemeral military adventure, then I am filled with foreboding. For the moment America loses interest in what it has initiated, the cycle of terror will resume.

This article does lead to some interesting lines of thought.

LVM

[Valin]

I keep telling people it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when we get hit again.

[nathanbedford]

If Bush mant to garrison the entire world of terrorist lands, we might indeed be biting off more than we can chew. But I believe the purpose is to serve up a few object lessons to would be Saddams and Talibans. If another pops up he can be batted down. Most dictators, (Saddam evidently excepted) fear loss of power above all and will behave themselves better.

[anniegetyourgun]

Well, I think you nailed it. The bulk of the article is a laugher. As to that last sentence, it does give one pause. Especially in light of the fact that it is liberals in this country who have the shortest attention span beyond their own power. If they regain it, they most assuredly will lose interest in any compassionate rebuilding. And worse, they will even lose interest in national security.