To: hchutch
And any bets as to how long before the paleos come in with their usual blather?
A uncomfortable as it may be for many here to accept, sometimes the paleos are right. Kristol's preformance yesterday on FOX was close to a tribute to the paleo logic that brought them to conclude he is an untrustworthy and slippery little sneak.
18 posted on
06/09/2003 1:06:06 PM PDT by
mr.pink
To: mr.pink
FWIW, this "neo-con" has never been a fan of Kristol's. Yes, he's an untrustoworthy sort, and his recent move comes as no particular surprise, since he's still a raging McCainite.
19 posted on
06/09/2003 1:07:49 PM PDT by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: mr.pink
Kristol was raising a possibility, but would it hurt? After 9/11, do you really think the American would want to take chances?
WMDs were never the sole reason - they got hyped by the press and others, but they were not the only reason.
23 posted on
06/09/2003 1:11:13 PM PDT by
hchutch
("If you don’t win, you don’t get to put your principles into practice." David Horowitz)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson