Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dpwiener
Cobalt60, strontium90.. cesium.
Which of those would you make a dirty bomb with?
Besides, flying a plane doesn't give you teh added bonus of killing people with thyroid cancer or other cancer later.
Nor do aircraft accidents.

Do try not to be more dense than needed.
31 posted on 06/09/2003 1:19:53 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare
Besides, flying a plane doesn't give you teh added bonus of killing people with thyroid cancer or other cancer later.

As a terror weapon, radiological bombs are pretty terrifying, mostly because the general public has been fed decades of over-hyped phobic reporting on the dangers of radioactivity. This is the same misinformation that has caused hysteria over depleted uranium weapons, or has blocked or slowed the use of irradiation on food to kill bacteria. Most people have no conception of the significance of various types or levels of radiation.

So yes, a dirty bomb will terrify a lot of people, and it will force huge evacuations, and it will destroy property values in affected cities to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars even if the reality is that the radiation levels are so low as to be almost indistinguishable from background levels. More people will die of heart attacks than get sick from radiation exposure.

If terrorist want to push the U.S. economy into a recession, a dirty bomb exploded in a major city would be a great way to accomplish that. If terrorists want to kill a lot of people, then they should instead use true Weapons of Mass Destruction.

37 posted on 06/09/2003 1:31:34 PM PDT by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson