As I read the editorial, it sounds to me as if they are advocating a situation
status quo ante the AWB. That is, they are opposed to controls on semi-auto weapons, and feel that only full auto weapons should be subject to the AWB.
While this is incrementalism, it is an improvement from the current situation; we can fight the provisions of the 1934 GCA another day.
As I read the editorial, it sounds to me as if they are advocating a situation status quo ante the AWB
Interesting read, but the context of the debate in regard to Richmond Times is the sunset of the AWB and the writer has completely crossed his/her wires.
Best regards,