Constitution Party Wants Supreme Court Justices Impeached

CNSNews.com ^ | 07/04/03 | Jeff Johnson.

[Chancellor Palpatine]

In case you never noticed, Rome was at its apex while it was deeply Pagan in belief. From the second decade of the 4th century until the eventual demise of Rome 150 years later, it was officially Christian, and the previous Pagan culture which fostered science, organization and law was officially oppressed. It took approximately 300 years for anything resembling some form of order to reassert itself in the West.

Christianity gains nothing by the misrepresentation of history.

[furnitureman]

Annan in historic meeting with Supreme Court &Congress/is believed to be unprecedented.http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b0c30a81760.htm

[Wolfie]

Telling that this is what gripes the Constitution Party. I didn't notice them getting hot and bothered when the SC stepped all over States' Rights to make their own marijuana laws. Libertarians in business suits, I guess.

[CaptIsaacDavis]

ALRIGHT! NOW TO GET THE CONSERVATIVE PARTIES (LIKE IN NY) AND ULTIMATELY THE GOP TO ADVANCE THIS -- this is a storm-wind blowing, and a breadth of fresh air. The White House had better get on board!

[breakem]

Try to focus. Here's a clue. you referred to Rome earlier and the fall of the republic. This had nothing to do with homosexuality unless you think Julius crossed the Rubican because he had a date with Pompey. Secondly, the empire survived another 400 years after that.

You can try to overload with information and articles I'm not yp for the game. In one example I have laid to rest one of your "sky is falling" references. I'll not lose any slepp because homosexuals can have sex with each other and you can't have them arrested.

Read my 8 and you will see that the real danger to our freedoms is the interpretation you take to the constitution and you subsequent surrendering to your state control over every aspect of your life. Thos of us who believe in liberty and the pursuit of happeness will not join your crusade.

[CaptIsaacDavis]

The conflict over Chase was CHILD's PLAY compared to the frontal assault of this Court on our basic right of self-governance and self-determination.

[breakem]

Wonder if peace and freedom party is finished with their name and would let half of it go. Conservatives for Freedom from governmental abuse of power.

[Kevin Curry]

According to this "party" and some freepers, the states have the right to tell us what to have for breaksaft, when to eat, when to go outside, what to name our kids, and on and on.

Horse manure.

As a citizen you have the obligation to participate in goverment at the state level to create a local government that meets your expectations. If you desire a fully libertine state where men can marry their sheep and smoke dope at government expense, get busy and do the hard work of persuading your fellow citizens why this should be desirable and elect representaives who will design a state in this fashion.

Your problem is that you're you're bone-idle lazy and incompetent. It's easier to whine and ask nanny government in the from of SCOTUS to chew your food for you.

Citizens such as yourself are worse than worthless. You are a pus-filled boil on the posterior of the body politic.

"Waaaah! Waaaah! Please Missus Ruthie! Please Missus Sandy! The big bad government won't let me pork my boyfriend in the butt. Waaaah! Save Me! Waaaaaaaaah!"

[breakem]

bumping your 21

[CaptIsaacDavis]

True Republicans don't weeep -- they FIGHT!

[furnitureman]

COMMUNIST GOALS (From The Congressional Record, Jan. 10, 1963)http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/922684/posts

[breakem]

Now Kevin, I know the idea that some adults have sex in ways you don't like upsets you, but you see, they don't have to go to jail for it.

For four years you have misstated my position. I don't engage in homosexual sex, Kevin, in fact I don't much care for the thought of it, but I recognize the idea of freedom and that these people have the same right to do this as some heterosexual couples.

You can whine and ridicule that position all you want, but in the end, you either believe in freedom or you don't and it's clear that you don't.

[breakem]

Uh, no thanx. You keep posting additional info and not answering the challenges to your position. If you need some time to rethink, I can check back tomorrow.

[furnitureman]

Supreme Court justices are going by International globalization laws now

[breakem]

Uh, I addressed your point about Rome and so did another poster. Any reply? If you want to try the justices for being part of the one-world- group, communist conspiracy, gaystopo aganed, or traiters, go ahead and file a complaint with the department of justice.

[breakem]

PS: Kevin I can't be bone-idol lazy when I'm apparently chasing sheep, smoking dope, engaging in sodomy day and night. seems like a full agenda, if you know what I mean.

[TheAngryClam]

The third largest political party is the Green Party, sadly.

For a long time it was the Libertarians.

The Constitution Party is a distant fifth. However, their California affiliate, the American Independent Party, gets a huge number of people who think they're registering as an independent, so who really knows.

[TheAngryClam]

Heresy.

Then again, you'll never, ever win over one of the Christians who think that Christianity was responsible for every event.

Kind of like "well, the Russians invented it first, but then X stole it from us."

[El Gato]

According to this "party" and some freepers, the states have the right to tell us what to have for breaksaft, when to eat, when to go outside, what to name our kids, and on and on. When and how did people get the idea that the constitution's purpose was to list all human rights. This type of think is dangerous and opens us up to the worst kind of totalitarianism. Let Freedom Ring!

First of all, states have no rights, only powers. Secondly, the people of the state should look to their own courts and Constitutions to protect against such abuses by state legislatures and executives, although in this case those things were pre-existing rights or powers of the people, and their retention of them is protected by the 9th amendment. There is no right to commit homosexual acts explicitly protected, and to argue that there is a right which pre-existed the Constitution to do so which is "retained" by the people, is pretty silly, especially in light of the fact that such practices were illegal in all of the 13 original states at the time. It was not protected by any laws, state Constitutions, nor those of the colonies of England itself.

It's also pretty silly to argue that anything anyone wants to do is a "fundamental right" not subject to any regulation by the states.

[El Gato]

Your remembrences of the good days brings up visions of slavery, women without property rights and bunches of good stuff. Oh, how I miss them old days when things were perfect.

Irrelevant. Slavery was made illegal via a Constitutional ammendment. Womens property rights were brought to the current state by laws passed by the states, and in the case of Voting, by a constitutional amendment, the rest tended to flow from that, although much change also occurred before the amendment. Most of the laws and such were on matters, such as property rights, which are in the juridiction of the states, and that's were the changes were made, even absent a federal Equal Rights Amendment.

Where do some people get the idea that every social problem must be solved, or can be solved, at the federal level and that everything is the buisiness of the federal courts?