Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Victoria Delsoul
The gay mafia -- openly gay activists who pass as journalists -- seeks to "out" high-profile, professional athletes as homosexual, in order to mainstream a sexual orientation which most Americans consider perverted, and apparently as an assault on the last preserve of the traditional masculinity they have declared war on. And if no gay superstars are handy, activists will invent some.

That's a good name for them. The idea is to change public opinion by imposing their beliefs on them and the younger the better. Their social conditioning starts at Elementary school with children as young as 5-6 years old. Homosexual and lesbian activists are invited to Schools under the banner of diversity to brainwash young minds by teaching them that homosexual families are just like any other family, and that they should be accepted and treated with respect. However, under the excuse of "respect," they are actually working on conversion and recruitment.

My favorite stealth education story is, IIRC, from massnews. A woman who worked for the state (MA) told a group of parents with kids in the public schools, about the wonderful gay sex she was teaching kids -- stuff like fisting. Unbeknownst to the "sex educator," a parent tape-recorded the lecture, which was perfectly legal for her to do. When the parent publicized what gays were pushing on kids, the sex pusher SUED the parent, claiming that the latter had violated HER privacy rights, by taping the lecture. Naturally, the sex pusher was supported by any number of gay activist groups. I believe that the courts refused to accept her "privacy" claim. (But that was pre-Lawrence.)

The claim by a civil servant, that she had privacy rights over the public lecture she had given at taxpayer expense, was the last straw for me, regarding gay claims about ... anything. The same phonies would frequently complain about "privatization": meanwhile, they seek to variously privatize or publicize everything, according to what they consider expedient at any given moment.

68 posted on 07/06/2003 5:04:53 PM PDT by mrustow (no tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: mrustow
When the parent publicized what gays were pushing on kids, the sex pusher SUED the parent, claiming that the latter had violated HER privacy rights, by taping the lecture. Naturally, the sex pusher was supported by any number of gay activist groups. I believe that the courts refused to accept her "privacy" claim. (But that was pre-Lawrence.)

Well, there is no stopping them now. The Supreme Court's ruling has opened the doors to dangerous ramifications, one of the them is that schools will be free to teach children that sodomy is alright and normal, just like heterosexual couples, and homosexuals will be working to lower the age of consent and other perversions.

78 posted on 07/06/2003 7:20:33 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson