[ArGee]

Does anybody here seriously think that the SC would allow sex with children, if it somehow made it all the way there. Seriously, the speculation is a bit silly.

30 years ago you could have read, "Does anybody here seriously think that the SC would allow homosexual sex, if it somehow made it all the way there. Seriously, the speculation is a bit silly."

Never understimate the power of sin to corrupt. Never.

Shalom.

[Protagoras]

30 years ago you could have read, "Does anybody here seriously think that the SC would allow homosexual sex, if it somehow made it all the way there. Seriously, the speculation is a bit silly."

Any thoughtful person can and did question the legitimate role of government in a free society 30 years ago, and throughout history.

The SC has not "allowed" homosexual sex, they have said it's none of their business one way or the other in a free society.

[Protagoras]

Never understimate the power of sin to corrupt. Never.

Sin will corrupt. Corruptors will sin. Some sins are crimes. Other sins are not. Not all sins concern other human beings.

[tdadams]

30 years ago you could have read, "Does anybody here seriously think that the SC would allow homosexual sex, if it somehow made it all the way there.

And 60 years ago you could have read "Does anybody here seriously think that the SC would allow blacks to use the same washroom and drink from the same fountains as whites, if it somehow made it all the way there."

[Marysecretary]

You are so right. We're like the frog in the pot. When it begins to boil, it doesn't realize it and it's cooked! All of this garbage is creeping up on us bit by bit and before we know it, we'll be buried in it. For shame.