Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F_Cohen
My 22 year old son said years ago that first they get us to accept homosexual sex, then necrophilia, beastiality, and pedophilia.
2 posted on 07/08/2003 7:16:52 AM PDT by buffyt (Can you say President Hillary, the Hildabeast, Mistress of ALL Darkness? Me Neither!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: buffyt
"My 22 year old son said years ago that first they get us to accept homosexual sex, then necrophilia, beastiality, and pedophilia."

The three things you note require only one consenting adult. However, I will reason like a judge here and rule for the perp.

Necrophilia is exempt from the consenting adults because one of them is dead, and it insults the court to even consider that a dead person can give consent. Therefore, as long as there is one consenting adult in this case, and as long as it is private, it is constitutional, and the police are not to interfere because it may harm the dignity of the live adult.

Animals are not listed in the Constitution. Therefore, animals are legal property of their owners. An animal is by logical definition, not an adult. Therefore, as long as bestiality takes place in the privacy of a home, and there is one consenting adult, it is constitutional, and the police are not to interfere because it may harm the dignity of the human adult.

Pedophilia deals with sex with children. Children are by definition not adults. However, if in the opinion of an adult, sex with a child would be beneficial to the child, and as long as it is in the privacy of the home, it is constitutional, and the police may not interfere because it would harm the dignity of the adult.

8 posted on 07/08/2003 7:55:36 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt
"My 22 year old son said years ago that first they get us to accept homosexual sex, then necrophilia, beastiality, and pedophilia."

So did I. Nobody believed me. Now the only question is: which band of perverts will be next to 'come out of the closet' and assert rights? My guess is the necrophiles, because they can make the claim that a corpse is not injured (it being past all caring) by any sexual act perpetrated upon it. We shall see.

--Boris

23 posted on 07/08/2003 8:39:34 AM PDT by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt
My 22 year old son said years ago that first they get us to accept homosexual sex, then necrophilia, beastiality, and pedophilia.

And when that happens, then you can come back and tell us "I told you so." Until then, you're just another fearmonger yelling that the sky is falling.

My prediction... it's never going to happen. And I'm willing to put my money on it.

36 posted on 07/08/2003 9:21:45 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt
My 22 year old son said years ago that first they get us to accept homosexual sex, then necrophilia, beastiality, and pedophilia.

When you accept those things, he will be right, until then, it's ludicrious.

48 posted on 07/08/2003 10:11:25 AM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt
My 22 year old son said years ago that first they get us to accept homosexual sex, then necrophilia, beastiality, and pedophilia.

It started long before that. When they got us to accept pre-marital sex, cohabitation, adultery, abortion, etc, etc.

If you outlaw one, you might as well outlaw them all. Keep sex within the bounds of marriage, where it belongs.

179 posted on 07/08/2003 10:58:03 PM PDT by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt
My 22 year old son said years ago that first they get us to accept homosexual sex, then necrophilia, beastiality, and pedophilia.

IMHO...The kids are Next...like 4 years olds...That's what a spokesqueen for NAMBLA said on a West Coast Radio program. Lets ask "the Sodomy 6" of the USSC... :(

217 posted on 07/09/2003 8:32:07 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt
I bet if you told someone 50 years ago (ok, I wasnt around, but I'm guessing) that gay "rights" and "parades" would be not only the norm but a political agenda they would have laughed at you. I'm just waiting for pedophiophila (sp?) to be the next cause for the wacky left to march for.

FWIW, I'm not against Gays personally, I dont like the agenda driven/in-your-face tactics that the militants are trying to shove down mainstream America. No one wants to know what these people do with each other in their bedroom - they dont want just "acceptance" they want minority/victim status and all the benefits they can pillage from it.
222 posted on 07/09/2003 8:44:25 AM PDT by FeliciaCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt
There is no way this ruling should allow sex with other animals. The non-human variety don't have human gestures or language, so we don't know when their consenting or not. Or even how old they are ("Heavens, the sheep was a minor official. She looked mature. . ."). So at least the courts should be able to give animals some rights and keep them safe from human sex. But remember Larry Flynt and the chicken. . .he's bragged about that all his life--but he shouldn't get egg all over his face for it.
255 posted on 07/09/2003 10:03:27 AM PDT by ReaganWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson