Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD
Capitol Hill Blue ^ | July 9, 2003 | Doug Thompson

Posted on 07/09/2003 4:04:00 PM PDT by Doug Thompson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,321-1,340 next last
To: Doug Thompson
Doug, can you get this information to Sean Hannity for tonights show???

GW is getting hammered by Chris Matthews. This story has to be corrected in the rest of the media ASAP.

61 posted on 07/09/2003 4:34:16 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Instead of just deleting the references, it would've been nice to have a list of all the stories that this con was quoted in, to better correct anyone who might have read these stories in the past and carried their misconceptions to this day.
62 posted on 07/09/2003 4:34:16 PM PDT by MaxPlus305
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Well, fine. But, the obvious question is, "Were you lying then or are you lying now?"

Why should we believe that what you've written above is truthful? How do we know what you said wasn't the result of extortion, threats, a bribe, or a promise of future goodies for retracting the first story. Claiming you were conned is a very small price to pay and from the comments, looks like it has increased your standing.

But, who is the guy? He had maintained a positive and useful cover for 20 years. You used him before but never had to contact him to check a fact or ask for a lead? And, why/how would he have identified you 20 years ago as a person he could con 20 years hence? Has any money, either way, ever changed hands? And, if you, why not several of your coequals?

I'm sorry, the story is too neat, too glib. There is more to it than has been written here.

63 posted on 07/09/2003 4:36:02 PM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Don't beat your self up, Doug. Sh!t happens, what the hell! Next time somebody is selling you a bill of goods, make sure, you know "exactly", who you're talking to.

In God we trust, all others, identify yourselves, with two US forms of identification.

64 posted on 07/09/2003 4:36:06 PM PDT by danmar ("The two most common elements in the Universe is Hydrogen and Stupidity" Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Uh.... WOW....

excuse me....

WOW...

Oh my God! Wow!

And the NY Times, Washington Post, ABC, CNN, Guardian or any other news regugitator that used your source as the basis for an outrageous attack on Bush said what when provided this information? (I know others didn't site the source, just repeated the basic claim of insider info about Bush)

Uh... thank you, by the way... Wow!

I claim to be a conservative, but I define that as a cynical liberal (I believe in most of the ideals, but don't think for minute that Teddy Kennedy, et al, are out for anyone but Teddy boy). You, however, have just messed up my beautiful cynicism about my most loathed profession (g).

65 posted on 07/09/2003 4:36:39 PM PDT by Phsstpok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
No kidding. He went out of his way to get quoted this time and then to end his contact completely by changing his phone number. He definitely wanted to go out in a blaze of attacking the President.
66 posted on 07/09/2003 4:37:10 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: Support Free Republic
...and further more, you are rude, cruel and inhumane! ;{)
68 posted on 07/09/2003 4:38:12 PM PDT by danmar ("The two most common elements in the Universe is Hydrogen and Stupidity" Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
You're a helluva guy for admitting it. More power to you, and keep up the good work.
69 posted on 07/09/2003 4:39:31 PM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
Yeah, I wonder how many journalists are writing stories based on "unnamed sources" that are bogus.
70 posted on 07/09/2003 4:39:53 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Do rat operatives have an attention span as long as 20 years?

Besides Hillary, that is- but she wasn't just a rat, IMHO, she's a red.

71 posted on 07/09/2003 4:40:01 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Tacis; mware; Dog Gone
Agreed.........there is something screwy with this story. A source of 20 years suddenly gets exposed and only now is found to have feed a reporter bad info for 20 long years.

I'm not buying it..

72 posted on 07/09/2003 4:40:11 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
If he has been sourced for the past 20 years, why is it that his name comes up nowhere in every search engine
73 posted on 07/09/2003 4:40:22 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
It takes a honest man to admit he screwed up. The road back up will be long, hard, and hard-fought, but I hope you're willing to persevere to regain the public trust. Good Luck!
74 posted on 07/09/2003 4:42:11 PM PDT by Maigrey (Member of the Dose's Jesus Freaks and Gonzo News Service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
lots
75 posted on 07/09/2003 4:43:08 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
"You can trust him, he's one of the good guys," one chief of staff told me

"Nobody, and I mean nobody, has ever heard of this guy," my source said.

Well, SOMEBODY has heard of him. Who was that chief of staff? Sounds to me like none of these sources are very reliable.

76 posted on 07/09/2003 4:44:26 PM PDT by Ima Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
hmmm a French Spy? French disruptor by placing false information in "the loop"?
77 posted on 07/09/2003 4:44:39 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I have an online detective system, that I bought for research the kids were doing on the first class to graduate from the school I teach at. I am going to do a search on that one.
78 posted on 07/09/2003 4:45:04 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
If he has been sourced for the past 20 years, why is it that his name comes up nowhere in every search engine

Because his alias is Greg Packer?

79 posted on 07/09/2003 4:45:06 PM PDT by unspun ("Do everything in love." - No I don't look anything like her but I do like to hear "Unspun w/ AnnaZ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
This guy wouldn't happen to look alot like Bob Mulholland would he?
;-)
80 posted on 07/09/2003 4:45:20 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,321-1,340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson