Posted on 07/11/2003 9:15:17 AM PDT by Colofornian
So, Phil Donahue was "pushing" his religious beliefs on her, eh, just by asking her a question on this that he already knew the answer to? Yet, she wasn't pushing her beliefs on the rest of the viewing world, now, was she? Typical liberal one-way street.
If a liberal is at the listening end of faith matters, then the speaker is imposing his morality. If the liberal is at the speaking end of faith matters, then the speaker is merely exposing her immorality. The latter is OK in the liberal, atheistic world; but the former is an offensive "no-no." Where you draw the arbitrary line is up to the liberal, depending on how quickly they want you to shut up.
She was a filthy, nasty old whore.
Not appetizing. Put some pants on, old woman!
She's looked like a hag to me for the last thirty years, but I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. She was attractive as a young actress. But what a left-wing loonie she was.
She didn't go, she made a private visit to the funeral home and that was it. He died in their home and she did have his wife and children, one of whom was deaf, contacted as soon as he died and she did do her best to remove herself from it all and let them carry out the final farewell. But so what? She had lived in adultery with him for years, somehow she is to be praised for letting them bury the dead?
She was a great actress, for whatever that is worth. There are great ladies in this world whose name we'll not know in this life, those are whom I salute.
As another adulteress profoundly wrote of a faithful wife in her novel Middlemarch, "..Her finely-touched spirit had still its fine issues, though they were not widely visible. Her full nature,...spent itself in channels which had no great name on the earth. But the effect of her being on those around her was incalculably diffusive: for the growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs."
BWAHAHAHAHYA!
FMCDH
Of course. That's why they are called liberals. They don't have to follow any formats or rules. They are "liberated" from such nonsense.
I used to get fliers in the mail from some pro-abortion outfit that had Hepburn's name on it. I generally sent scathing letters back to them, excoriating them for encouraging murder, etc, but the fliers kept coming.
I then told them that I agreed with them and that "womens' lib." was really mens' liberation because it absolved us of all responsibility of having sex and that I appreciated all the work that they were doing to free us men from having to pay for our actions.
I haven't heard from them since.
She still had her statuesque features as an old woman. I thought she was remarkably attractive for her age, but her head was alway shaking.
All Hepburn needed to do was make a preannounced public appearance elsewhere that day to get the press jackals off of Louise's back.
Now everyone romanticizes it as "oh, she stayed away out of respect!"
No doubt the "recipients" of that fave charity--the young-ones (English for the Latin, "fetuses") were her personal greeters upon her death. We can't bring those who were deliberately delivered dead back down here; but we can go to them: "On the seventh day the child died...'Can I bring him back again? I will go to him, but he will not return to me'" (David, father of the baby, 2 Samuel 12:18, 23)
I'm willing to look uneducated, who penned your wonderful quotation.
Translation: Don't thump others, lest ye be thumped by me.
And now that Ron has "thumped" (judged) those he's labeled as judgmental, we can settle down into what I call the Palestinian thump for thump show.
You see, those RonH is accusing of judging others can turn around to Ron and rightfully claim, "How dare you judge me as being judgmental toward others!" In fact, they can now rightfully cite the same verses back to Ron.
Ron, thereby knowing the Palestinian 2-step well, shoots back a note saying: "How dare you accuse me of judging others! I'm the one standing up on ye highest mountain, accusing you of judging others. Just because I judge you as being judgmental toward others, you can't turn around and accuse one who is taking 'the higher road' of doing the same thing."
Now this becomes a real problem for liberals; they can't stand absolutes, but they have to quote them to keep the "Bible thumpers" in check when they "uppity" and start "intolerantly judging" others. But by responding, they show their hand that they are not as tolerant as they want folks to think they are...and once you label another as judgmental, yes, you, too, have joined the panel of judges!
Boy, it's tough to be a liberal these days. So many catch-22s to watch out for!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.