Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An End Run Around Fed Blackmailers
The County Press (Second Thoughts) ^ | 7-16-03 | William W. Lawrence

Posted on 07/16/2003 8:25:11 AM PDT by Temple Owl

Second Thoughts

By William W. Lawrence

Pennsylvania lawmakers won one and lost one in recent days. They appear to be doing a neat end-run around federal blackmailers who are demanding that Pennsylvania lower its blood alcohol limit from 0.10 to .08 percent.

Pennsylvania legislators must pass a law lowering the limit by Oct. 1, 2003 to avoid losing $11.9 million in federal highway funds withheld in 2004.

So they will. What it apparently calls for is simply a wake-up call with just minor penalties for those nailed driving with a blood alcohol content of between .08 percent and 0.10.

But the repeat boozehounds who are excessively accountable for the injuries and fatalities in alcohol-related crashes are going to get hit hard. Good work!

But while we can praise Delco State Reps Bill Adolph (R-165) and Tom Killion (R-168) for opposing the helmet-repeal law, we are giving a strong thumbs-down to those who voted in favor of it.

Getting the law repealed was a pet project of the late Sen. Clarence Bell. I believe Mr. Bell may have been the best legislator in recent state history. But while I think he was wrong on this one, I will pray that he was right. I have a feeling it is going to cause us many tears, heartbreak and grief.

***

New Jersey could not, under its constitution, fire its tarnished poet laureate, Amiri Baraka.

So, the Legislature eliminated the position.

Baraka, nee Everett LeRoi Jones, has been called one of America's premier haters and anti-Semites.

A beaming Democratic Gov. Jim McGreevey proudly appointed him to the two-year, $10,000 post just last August, at a bill-signing ceremony at the governor's mansion. Mr. Baraka, 68, came under heavy criticism when he wrote a poem suggesting that Israel knew the 9/11 attacks against the World Trade Center would occur. He has said he is not anti-Semitic and has refused to resign.

His defenders said he had the right to freedom of speech. His opponents said such statements should not be made by someone in a state-sanctioned post.

What will New Jersey do without a poet laureate?

***

The Inquirer Magazine -- which many of us jaundiced viewers looked upon as an arm of the Democratic party calling for more taxes, more government and let's lose the war -- is officially dead. The writers of its obituary have promised us more of the same in the new broadsheet section of the paper that will replace it. Look for continuous Bush bashing and perhaps a poem a week from Amiri Baraka.

***

Sen. Rick Santorum, (R-Pa.), was, not long ago, asked on "After Hours with Cal Thomas" on the Fox News Channel: "You wear an angel lapel pin every day on your suit. What is that about?"

"That's when my son died," answered the senator. "One of the things I did was think to myself how I could keep him present ... and I just thought it had to be something simple, just something that most people wouldn't even notice, most people don't notice.

"It's just a little lapel pin, a little angel lapel pin, and it's a constant reminder to me of the gift that God gave me and my son and his life and that I have a little soldier up in heaven who's pulling for his dad." Sen. Santorum's infant son was named Gabriel Michael.

(Excerpt) Read more at zwire.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dui; helmetlaw; inquirermagazine; poetlaureate; santorum
Even the Pennsylvania legislators get it right once in a whle.
1 posted on 07/16/2003 8:25:14 AM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Pennsylvania legislators must pass a law lowering the limit by Oct. 1, 2003 to avoid losing $11.9 million in federal highway funds withheld in 2004.

I've seen this tactic used often on our state legislature. It is very successful. Dismayingly so.

2 posted on 07/16/2003 9:07:30 AM PDT by Eala (A Republic. If you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
It would be better if the states could wean themselves off the federal tit. $11.9 million is a paltry sum in a state the size of and the wealth of Pennsylvania.
3 posted on 07/16/2003 9:12:07 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I wish one of these state legislatures would grow some stones and when the feds try this blackmail with federal highway money, they should impound an equal amount of the federal gas tax collected within the state. But doing that or, as you suggested, just telling them to go pound sand and keep their money would require a backbone...something in short supply in politics.
4 posted on 07/16/2003 9:16:17 AM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
A fantasy I have is that the feds try one of their typical blackmails and the state just says, "Really? Then get the hell out of our state. Take all your federal employees and federal money and stick it. And, by the way, we aren't sending you any more federal income tax money or other taxes other than enough to pay a fair portion of the defense of this nation. We'll just handle it without your meddling and asinine rules and red tape, thank you."
5 posted on 07/16/2003 9:27:48 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
And, by the way, we aren't sending you any more federal income tax money

An Indian tribe in Rhode Island tried to do that with paltry cigarette taxes and had the dogs sicced on them. What happens when you start talking about real money?
6 posted on 07/16/2003 9:48:15 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lelio
But we are talking about a tiny indian tribe in an even more tiny state. What if Texas told them to take a flying leap?
7 posted on 07/16/2003 10:00:08 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lelio
A rather amusing side-note to this, anyone who carries a CDL license is automatically exposed to charges if he has over a .08 alcohol content in his blood. CDL's are governed by Federal laws. Now we have the Feds fining a state for this very law.
8 posted on 07/16/2003 10:01:29 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
That's the plan I'd want to see. Have your secretary type it up and I'll sign it!
9 posted on 07/16/2003 10:15:57 AM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Yea, right. Like I said, I'm not a programmer and I have absolutely no idea how that would be accomplished.
10 posted on 07/16/2003 10:17:49 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Another side note: federal jurisdiction

The article states the following:

"Pennsylvania legislators must pass a law lowering the limit by Oct. 1, 2003 to avoid losing $11.9 million in federal highway funds withheld in 2004."

The implication and fact is that our federal government has no legislative jurisdiction with the boundaries of sovereign state, except as Art I, Sec 8, Cl 17 defines, do enact blood alcohol content laws. That is why the states have to be "black mailed" to pass such laws.

With the issue of no federal legislative jurisdiction being the case for blood alcohol content laws, why is the issue of a lack of federal legislative jurisdiction not a question with many other federal laws, such as the use of marijuana? (rhetorical question)

11 posted on 07/16/2003 10:19:05 AM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Sorry, I responded on the wrong thread. But if you are truly interested, do a google search on "Free State Project". Their plan is to move enough politically active people into a state to take control of it and tell the feds to get bent.
12 posted on 07/16/2003 10:19:57 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
ping
13 posted on 07/16/2003 12:32:58 PM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
It would be better if the states could wean themselves off the federal tit. $11.9 million is a paltry sum in a state the size of and the wealth of Pennsylvania.

Actually, I'm kind of pleased with the way Pennsylvania lawmakers did it. They apparently are not going to penalize anybody with an alky blood count of under .10 with anything but a wink and a warning. And they get to keep the money.

I wish all states would do more of this kind of thing.

14 posted on 07/16/2003 12:39:13 PM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Sen. Rick Santorum, (R-Pa.), was, not long ago, asked on "After Hours with Cal Thomas" on the Fox News Channel: "You wear an angel lapel pin every day on your suit. What is that about?"

"That's when my son died," answered the senator. "One of the things I did was think to myself how I could keep him present ... and I just thought it had to be something simple, just something that most people wouldn't even notice, most people don't notice.

"It's just a little lapel pin, a little angel lapel pin, and it's a constant reminder to me of the gift that God gave me and my son and his life and that I have a little soldier up in heaven who's pulling for his dad." Sen. Santorum's infant son was named Gabriel Michael.

Santorum is America's best senator.

15 posted on 07/16/2003 1:03:04 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Willie Green; Mo1; ..
ping
16 posted on 07/17/2003 6:57:28 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Santorum is America's best senator.

And if we can get Pat Toomey elected America's two best senators will be from Pennsylvania.

17 posted on 07/17/2003 7:51:13 AM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
bump
18 posted on 07/18/2003 7:09:46 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson