Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Perhaps Ann Coulter's next book project should be called Sedition: How The Democrats and Their Media Wage War Against the United States :-)
1 posted on 07/16/2003 10:00:31 AM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kiryandil
Great suggestion. I am so thankful we have Ann and her guts.
2 posted on 07/16/2003 10:03:04 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
Trent Lott to 'Jihad' Jim McDermott while in Baghdad:

He best better come home and keep his mouth shut!
3 posted on 07/16/2003 10:05:54 AM PDT by PeaceCorpsGuy (Of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
I think this issue is "Political Black Ice." Like real "black ice," you never see it coming and once you hit it, there is NO TRACTION and NO WAY TO RECOVER. Especially if you are speeding.

Let them accelerate on this.
4 posted on 07/16/2003 10:12:49 AM PDT by frithguild (Black Ice thoughts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
---"While the 3 Democrats were in Baghdad, did they make representations to Saddam Hussein that their fellow Democrats and the Democrats' friends in the mainstream liberal media were willing to commit seditious acts to buttress Hussein's increasingly tenuous hold on his country? Did they advise Hussein that his WMDs should be secreted, in order to facilitate allegations that the Bush administration "lied" about Iraq? Did the Democrats promise Hussein the political head of Bush and the gutting of his administration in exchange for a resumption of Democrat control of the U.S. government through a Watergate-style political coup?"---



This doesn't hold water at all. Although it is pro-Sadaam entities which are carrying out the current attacks, they lack the force necessary to sugjugate the country even if the US pulls out. The Shiites, the majority of the population, and the Kurds, the most militarily organized, would not allow a return to Sunni control. Without the WMD's and Republican Guard, the Sadaam loyalist lack the force to control the country. They can be a problem, but they can't regain control.
5 posted on 07/16/2003 10:15:13 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
While the 3 Democrats were in Baghdad, did they make representations to Saddam Hussein that their fellow Democrats and the Democrats' friends in the mainstream liberal media were willing to commit seditious acts to buttress Hussein's increasingly tenuous hold on his country?

Hussein didn't need to be told this, The Chinese were obviously aware, they contributed heavily to ELECT a democrat, Saddam already knew what democrats were willing to do to stay in or regain power.

Did they advise Hussein that his WMDs should be secreted, in order to facilitate allegations that the Bush administration "lied" about Iraq?

This statement attributes entirely too much credit for smarts to the democrats and too little to Saddam.

6 posted on 07/16/2003 10:16:03 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
Check out this article from today's Seattle P.I. Be forwarned, it's one you'll need a barf bag handy. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/jamieson/131032_robert16.html
7 posted on 07/16/2003 10:22:34 AM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
bump to the top against these Benedict Arnolds!!
12 posted on 07/16/2003 10:37:17 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
Bonior also claimed that both he and Mcdermott (nodded in agreement) were Nam vets. Neither were in Nam!
13 posted on 07/16/2003 10:48:54 AM PDT by Coroner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
In a time of war, the Democrats are deliberately undermining the bold U.S. strategic stroke in the Middle East in order to regain their lost political power.

I am sure the Democrats would stoop this low, but would Saddam trust them? The last time he dealt with a Democrat President the attacks on Iraq were capricious and came with less warning. If anything, Saddam would be skeptical. Although, he and they are birds-of-a-feather.

CB^o

14 posted on 07/16/2003 10:57:11 AM PDT by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
Why was this man smiling?


16 posted on 07/16/2003 11:16:57 AM PDT by McGruff (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
That much money would have tempted any democrat to be a traitor! Bonior, under any circumstances, wouldn't have far to go.
17 posted on 07/16/2003 11:20:07 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
The Dems don't have to make a deal with anyone, they don't need facts or substance. All they need is a following so filled with hatred that they will attach themselves to any charge and cling to it until it breaks apart.
Common sense is the lifeboat that refuse to board.
18 posted on 07/16/2003 11:21:39 AM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
In short, the DNC memo asks Democrats in office and Democrats in the press to join in trashing the entire Bush Administration and all of the current foreign policies of the United States, for the purpose of making the Administration and the nation weaker so the Democrats have a chance to take over the wreckage.

from Congressman Billybob's latest: Congressman Billybob Sez: Why I Hate Lawyers

Textbook example of sedition.

19 posted on 07/16/2003 11:21:56 AM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
"Oh No Briar Dems, Don't throw us in the Uranium Patch said Rabbit Bush!!!" It is great to see a President who is not continually being pushed by the polls. He was right and has NOTHING to appologize for. The truth being protected by Dasshole, Carville and The Wicked Witch of New York??

Pray for GW and the Truth

20 posted on 07/16/2003 11:25:35 AM PDT by bray ( Old Glory Stands for Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
Did they advise Hussein that his WMDs should be secreted, in order to facilitate allegations that the Bush administration "lied" about Iraq? Did the Democrats promise Hussein the political head of Bush and the gutting of his administration in exchange for a resumption of Democrat control of the U.S. government through a Watergate-style political coup?

Sounds a bit far-fetched, and this theory would be a hard sell in Middle America, but to tell you the truth, I wouldn't put anything past the Democrat liberal socialists. Anything.

Coulter's book, as one example, was very revealing about the agenda of liberals. I'm glad I got out of that mindset. BIG TIME.

27 posted on 07/16/2003 1:17:33 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
You know the rules! You mentioned Ann. Now we need our picture. ;)
28 posted on 07/16/2003 1:26:33 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil; timestax; Howlin
old times' sake bump...
46 posted on 04/09/2004 10:14:50 PM PDT by piasa (Understatement of the Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson