Federal prosecutors claim link between Virginia terrorism suspects, al-Qaida

Also note, their meeting place, the LARGE mosque just a few hundred FEET east of the Home Depot shooting.

You're right. The walk from Home Depot to the Dar al-Hijra mosque would be about 10 minutes, perhaps less.

And Dal al-Hijra is a notorious hotbed of Wahabbism and Islamist militancy, and yes, also the place visited by several of the 9/11 hijackers. So I would think it would have a special appeal to apocalyptic nutballs such as Malvo and Muhammad. (Much was published about Dar al-Hijra right after 9/11, and its centrality among Islamist militants wasn't much of a secret).

My gut says you're right, but there's no way to prove it unless the perps admit to it.

And you are absolutely right. Here's Judge Brinkema's bio:

Education:

Douglass College, B.A., 1966.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, graduate studies in philosophy, 1966.
NYU, graduate studies in philosophy, 1967-1969.
Rutgers, M.L.S., 1970.
Cornell, J.D., 1976.
Work Experience.

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, 1976-1977.
U.S. Attorney's office, E.D. Virginia, Criminal Division, 1977-1983.
U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, 1983-4.
Solo Practitioner, 1984-5.
U.S. Magistrate Judge, E.D. Virginia, 1985-1993.
U.S. District Court Judge.

Nominated by President Bill Clinton.
Entered duty 10/23/93.

She's a real piece of work. The ACLU loves her.

"Judge Brinkema recently presided in two Internet related cases which received wide publicity, Urofsky v. Allen and Mainstream Loudoun v. Loudoun County Library.

See, Summary of Mainstream Loudoun v. Loudoun County Library.
In the Loudoun case website operators and authors whose web pages may have been blocked asked the federal court to prevent the county public library from using Internet blocking software on public access computers in the library. All plaintiffs alleged that use of the software violated their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Judge Brinkema agreed, and found the library's policy unconstitutional. The library decided not to appeal.

The Congress is very likely to pass a bill requiring schools and libraries receiving e-rate subsidies to use filtering software. In the inevitable legal challenge, the ACLU will rely heavily on Judge Brinkema's November 23, 1998 Opinion in the Loudoun case.

In the Urofsky case several Virginia state employees challenged the constitutionality of a state statute barring state employees from using their computers at work to view porn. Judge Brinkema agreed, and held the statute unconstitutional. Virginia appealed, and Judge Brinkema was reversed by a unanimous Opinion of a three judge Court of Appeals panel."

http://www.techlawjournal.com/people/brinkema.htm

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.