Yep. And I still can't believe that there's any question of Saddam having chemical weapons considering he has killed at least 60,000 of his own people with them in the past 15 years.
I think people don't think about the "volume" of chemical weapons, only the volume of destruction. Just think of the anthrax letters, a nuclear "suitcase", a few vials of ??, a barrel full of ????
The big thing about finding them is to destroy them....not to satisfy the droolings of the anti-Bush folks.