These are scripture quotes. I wouldn't classify them as "Atheist Cites." But to address your point, all of them cannot be correct, so one or more of these particular passages must be wrong. Hence, there is error.
Hehehe…Who’s conclusions and analysis are used here? That would be the atheists and your endorsement of them.
Stories of the resurrection of Jesus differ. They differ on whether it was one (John 20:1-8), two (Matthew 28:1), three (Mark 16:1) or more (Luke 24:10) women who went to Jesus' tomb.
OK so let’s look at your very first cite and see if it holds water. First of all Luke 24:10 is about who went to see the apostles NOT who went to the sepulchre. This is a lie from the get go and impeaches the rest of your atheist spin.
Second, the accounts in John, Mark and Luke are about Mary Magdalene and that’s consistent in ALL verses, who she was with was unimportant, to say they “differ” is yet another lie. If three people told a story about what YOU did playing basketball and one said you made a dunk, and another said you made a dunk off the pass from Kobe and the third person said you made a dunk off the pass from Kobe against Shaquille is there ANY “difference” in what happened??? Of course not.
Since your atheist cite is so easily debunked in their very first sentence the rest of your atheism spin/spam isn’t worth the time to challenge. You have NO faith; I feel sorry for you.