To: newgeezer
Nukes suck!
2 posted on
08/04/2003 12:32:33 PM PDT by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrisssssssstian)
To: biblewonk
so what do we do when the wind dies down. I know S. Dakota has a lot of windmills, dilligaf, they are NOT RELIABLE!
MORE NUKES - LESS KOOKS!
4 posted on
08/04/2003 12:35:10 PM PDT by
ctlpdad
(Please fill in the complaint form attached should you disagree.)
To: biblewonk
Nukes suck!
Yep .. that's why they are safer than ALL petroleum based energy plants ... and produce less radiation than them as well.
5 posted on
08/04/2003 12:35:17 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: biblewonk
Boost Your Generating Efficiency!(blow some of that hot air into your windmill)
8 posted on
08/04/2003 12:39:53 PM PDT by
dogbrain
("Life is hard son. It's harder if you're stupid.")
To: biblewonk
Nukes suck!Frankly, it sounds like they have everything under control. My only argument with nukes is that they don't spend more of the fuel before they look for a place to bury it.
12 posted on
08/04/2003 12:51:21 PM PDT by
newgeezer
(A conservative who conserves -- a true capitalist!)
To: biblewonk
Shivering in dark caves SUCKS!
22 posted on
08/04/2003 2:55:30 PM PDT by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson