Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCHWARZENEGGER CANDIDACY WOULD ''TERMINATE'' MORAL LEADERSHIP IN CALIFORNIA
TraditionalValues.Org ^ | TVC

Posted on 08/09/2003 3:36:55 PM PDT by webber

SCHWARZENEGGER CANDIDACY WOULD ''TERMINATE'' MORAL LEADERSHIP IN CALIFORNIA

Schwarzenegger is No Reagan

Hollywood, CA - Rev. Louis P. Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition, said today Arnold Schwarzenegger would create a "moral vacuum" in Sacramento if he became California's governor.

As Governor, Mr. Schwarzenegger would be a darker villain than any he has faced in his movies. And when it comes to the moral issues that Californians really care about - he gives us inaction not action.

He announced the formation of Californians for Moral Government (CMG) to oppose Schwarzenegger's candidacy.

It is hard to imagine a worse governor than Gray Davis but Mr. Schwarzenegger would be it. California has enough problems without adding a Governor Schwarzenegger to the mix.

Make no mistake about it, Ronald Reagan was a great actor who became a great Governor and great President. But Ronald Reagan has strong moral principles - there is no evidence that Mr. Schwarzenegger has any strong moral convictions on any public issue.

He would be wise to take the advice he offered in a recent television interview - '…when you are successful and you change, you are an idiot'.

We will begin a public campaign to encourage Mr. Schwarzenegger to stick to destroying bad guys in his movies rather than laying waste to our state from Sacramento.

His films may be amusing but his candidacy is not.


This article comes from Traditional Values Coalition
http://traditionalvalues.org
The URL for this story is:



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; mcclintock; mcloser; mcmarginalized; rino; saynotorinos; schwarzenegger; schwarzenrino; tvc; vote4mcclintock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

1 posted on 08/09/2003 3:36:55 PM PDT by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: webber
How can Arnold "terminate" the state's moral leadership when moral leadership doesn't currently exist in CA? Jeeze, get some perspective.

You want a more conservative candidate? Fine. But spare us the ludicrous, credibility-damaging hyperbole.
2 posted on 08/09/2003 3:39:57 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
I fully expect Republicans to screw this election up to the point of handing it to the Democrats. This is just one example. They blew it with Simon and they are going to blow it again by not supporting Arnold.
3 posted on 08/09/2003 3:40:52 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber

4 posted on 08/09/2003 3:42:13 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (There are 2 types of people in this world: those who like Neil Diamond and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
I agree. As Rush once said "The Republicans do not know how to handle power.".
5 posted on 08/09/2003 3:43:45 PM PDT by duckman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
WILL THEY EVER LEARN...We're doomed.
6 posted on 08/09/2003 3:43:49 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: webber
...would create a "moral vacuum" in Sacramento...

Could be too late - no?

7 posted on 08/09/2003 3:44:05 PM PDT by Libloather (No daughter of mine is catching dinner with her teeth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Note that the leading, baiting headline has absolutely NOTHING to back it up in the actual text of the press release.

I guess the "Traditional Values Coalition" is now part and parcel of the DNC, happily participating in the Gray Davis/California RAT Politics of Personal Destruction campaign.

8 posted on 08/09/2003 3:45:28 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
They blew it in 1998 too. Lungren wasn't good enough. Didn't make any difference who won so conservatives stayed home. Well, well...turned out it did matter, didn't it?
9 posted on 08/09/2003 3:47:12 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
How can Arnold "terminate" the state's moral leadership when moral leadership doesn't currently exist in CA? Jeeze, get some perspective.

Agreed. It's been years since there was any sort of "moral" leadership in Kalifornia. This idiot isn't helping the GOP any, by his crazy rantings.

By the looks of it, the Kalif. GOP is about to screw up another election again, only to flush the entire state down the drain. Good luck getting it back later.

10 posted on 08/09/2003 3:48:56 PM PDT by kstewskis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: webber
Arnold is a gift to America.

He is an inspiration, fiscally sharp (Masters in Economics), and larger than life.

His impact on the Republican movement in California will be enormous.

Rush and the Rev. are dead wrong.

Schwarzenegger is the classic immigrant who made it big.

The American Dream come true. Arnold laments its passage in California, because it was the stuff of legends.

A return to this nostalgic past is as conservative as one gets, and I will support him wholeheartedly.

I suggest all Freepers do as well - IF YOU WANT TO LIVE.
11 posted on 08/09/2003 3:50:24 PM PDT by Stallone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Listened to much radio commentary today on the Arnie candidacy, and as usual there was much lamenting and rending of garments on the ironclad right; he’s not this, he’s not that, he said this, he sleeps with a Shriver, etc. I am always mystified by people who would rather die pure than live with imperfections. Every candidate will always disappoint, somehow. Any candidate with whom you agree 100% is probably unelectable. If your bumpersticker says DON’T BLAME ME, I VOTED FOR AYN RAND I'm not particularly impressed. ‘Cause she’s dead and none of that stuff is going to happen. Doesn’t mean we can’t keep the ideas in play, but if you don’t vote because no candidate vows to privatize the sewage systems and disband the Food and Drug Administration, don’t come crying to me when your marginal tax rate hits 71 percent.
(Source:http://www.lileks.com/bleats/archive/03/0803/080803.html)
12 posted on 08/09/2003 4:07:04 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Hmmmm? They're tearing down Arnold - but who are they supporting ..??
13 posted on 08/09/2003 4:09:53 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Not for me.

I'm supporting McClintock.
14 posted on 08/09/2003 4:12:29 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
...who are they supporting?

Hopefully, Tom McClintock.

15 posted on 08/09/2003 4:13:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: webber
I thought the fact that one of the leading bragging rights from California's Chamber of Commerce is that there already is a "Moral Vacumn" in California. So what harm could Arnold possibly do?
16 posted on 08/09/2003 4:14:21 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Is there much for moral leadership in California now, at least that could capture enough of the vote to attain political power? Arnold is not trying to be anything but what he is, an affable fellow with high recognition factor. At heart, nobody really believes that Arnold is the protagonist in "True Lies", or "Terminator", he is just playing a part. And the governorship would be exactly that, playing another part.
17 posted on 08/09/2003 4:22:03 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Yes, hopefully!
18 posted on 08/09/2003 4:25:39 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
No, we're not doomed.

The best we can do for California and ultimately the nation (election 2004) is exactly what you're doing now.

This is the grass roots support that's needed...
The steady, relentless, real solutions that will break the
stubborn resistance of (so-called, self-righteous) 'purity' over 'pragmatism'.
19 posted on 08/09/2003 4:35:27 PM PDT by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
"Hmmmm? They're tearing down Arnold - but who are they supporting ..?? "

it doesn't matter to "pinko commie-libs"
as long as it isn't a "kennedy loving son of a nazi..."

20 posted on 08/09/2003 4:40:33 PM PDT by hoot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson