Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hatch Wants Naturalized Citizens to Be Eligible for Presidency
C-SPAN "Washington Journal" | 08-19-03 | Theodore R.

Posted on 08/19/2003 12:52:04 PM PDT by Theodore R.

On Tuesday's C-SPAN "Washington Journal," hosted by Paul Orgle, it was noted that Senate Judiciary Chairman Orrin G. Hatch, R-UT, favors legislation that would permit a naturalized citizen of at least 20 years to seek the presidency or vice presidency as well. Hatch is said to think it discriminatory that the Constitution limits the two highest offices to "natural born" citizens.

Hatch's proposal presumably would require a constitutional amendment.

However, the report seemed to say (and I could have missed the essence of it) that Hatch thought he make an end run around the Constitution with legislation. Similarly, liberals who support statehood for the District of Columbia say that such a change could also be accomplished without a constitutional amendment.

Hatch's proposal apparently is an outgrowth of the gubernatorial candidacy of liberal Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger in CA. Schwarzenegger, an Austrian by birth, is ineligible to be considered for the presidency or the vice presidency.

Schwarzenegger is a nephew by marriage of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-MA. Hatch, who was first elected as a conservative in 1976, is known for his close friendship with Kennedy, his long-time colleague on the Judiciary Committee.

Hatch has frequently stirred fear among conservatives. In 1998, he "begged" President Clinton to "come clean" on the Monica Lewinsky affair. A year later, he was ambivalent in the impeachment trial that came before the Senate though he finally voted to convict Clinton on both counts against him.

Hatch is also known as a strong supporter of open-borders immigration.

In 2000, he briefly sought the GOP presidential nomination, only to bow out in favor of George W. Bush.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: citizens; electionpresident; hatch; judiciary; naturalized; presidency; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2003 12:52:05 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Theodore R.
However, the report seemed to say (and I could have missed the essence of it) that Hatch thought he make an end run around the Constitution with legislation. Similarly, liberals who support statehood for the District of Columbia say that such a change could also be accomplished without a constitutional amendment.

Heck, they've been usurping power for years without a Constitutional amendment, I guess they no longer feel the need to pretend otherwise. That's not a good sign.

3 posted on 08/19/2003 12:53:34 PM PDT by dirtboy (Arnold's positions are like the alien in Predator - you can't see them but you know they're lethal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
A prelude to an under the table campaign for Michigan's Debbie S. for prez?
4 posted on 08/19/2003 12:54:29 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Makes sense that Orrin would be brown-nosing Ahhhnold.

He is a world-famous songwriter after all.

If you're going to do this, why even bother requiring the President to be a citizen, period?
5 posted on 08/19/2003 12:55:14 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Article II is as clear as can be:

"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President"

6 posted on 08/19/2003 12:55:39 PM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Makes sense ----- in Scottish law, which he obeys.

Are you confusing Orrin Hatch with Arlen Specter? Specter is the one who voted 'not proved', this article mentions Hatch voted for impeachment.

7 posted on 08/19/2003 12:55:46 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Hatch is a traitor to the Republicans.
8 posted on 08/19/2003 12:56:09 PM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
But Orrin G. Hatch thinks he is "above" the Constitution on this point: wiser and more compassionate than the Founding "Fathers." I still wonder what people in UT see in this senator, but he is apparently here to stay for many more years?
9 posted on 08/19/2003 12:57:04 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
NOOOWAY RINOS!
10 posted on 08/19/2003 12:57:45 PM PDT by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Cue the "Armor Hot Dogs" jingle...
11 posted on 08/19/2003 12:57:50 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
No, it was Hatch, not Specter. Specter voted against impeachment, but Hatch wound up reluctantly voting for both resolutions.
12 posted on 08/19/2003 12:58:04 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
NO!
13 posted on 08/19/2003 12:58:16 PM PDT by bedolido (None of us is as dumb as all of us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
Yes. Thanks
14 posted on 08/19/2003 12:58:52 PM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Is there any difference?
15 posted on 08/19/2003 12:59:03 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Hatch's proposal presumably would require a constitutional amendment.

Presumably? Sheesh.

16 posted on 08/19/2003 12:59:03 PM PDT by b4its2late (The Road Map to Peace is looking more like a "Road Map to Pieces".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Batten down the Hatch, boys, he's flapping in the breeze.
17 posted on 08/19/2003 1:00:19 PM PDT by eniapmot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
IMHO, this proposal is DOA.
18 posted on 08/19/2003 1:01:34 PM PDT by elbucko (Freedom. It won't make you smart, but you'll stupid without it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
What a fool! He & Teddy. That raps up your "Two-Party Cartel".
19 posted on 08/19/2003 1:01:41 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper
ping
20 posted on 08/19/2003 1:01:46 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("When do I get to lift my leg on the liberal?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson