Skip to comments.
Hatch Wants Naturalized Citizens to Be Eligible for Presidency
C-SPAN "Washington Journal"
| 08-19-03
| Theodore R.
Posted on 08/19/2003 12:52:04 PM PDT by Theodore R.
On Tuesday's C-SPAN "Washington Journal," hosted by Paul Orgle, it was noted that Senate Judiciary Chairman Orrin G. Hatch, R-UT, favors legislation that would permit a naturalized citizen of at least 20 years to seek the presidency or vice presidency as well. Hatch is said to think it discriminatory that the Constitution limits the two highest offices to "natural born" citizens.
Hatch's proposal presumably would require a constitutional amendment.
However, the report seemed to say (and I could have missed the essence of it) that Hatch thought he make an end run around the Constitution with legislation. Similarly, liberals who support statehood for the District of Columbia say that such a change could also be accomplished without a constitutional amendment.
Hatch's proposal apparently is an outgrowth of the gubernatorial candidacy of liberal Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger in CA. Schwarzenegger, an Austrian by birth, is ineligible to be considered for the presidency or the vice presidency.
Schwarzenegger is a nephew by marriage of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-MA. Hatch, who was first elected as a conservative in 1976, is known for his close friendship with Kennedy, his long-time colleague on the Judiciary Committee.
Hatch has frequently stirred fear among conservatives. In 1998, he "begged" President Clinton to "come clean" on the Monica Lewinsky affair. A year later, he was ambivalent in the impeachment trial that came before the Senate though he finally voted to convict Clinton on both counts against him.
Hatch is also known as a strong supporter of open-borders immigration.
In 2000, he briefly sought the GOP presidential nomination, only to bow out in favor of George W. Bush.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: citizens; electionpresident; hatch; judiciary; naturalized; presidency; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: Theodore R.
However, the report seemed to say (and I could have missed the essence of it) that Hatch thought he make an end run around the Constitution with legislation. Similarly, liberals who support statehood for the District of Columbia say that such a change could also be accomplished without a constitutional amendment. Heck, they've been usurping power for years without a Constitutional amendment, I guess they no longer feel the need to pretend otherwise. That's not a good sign.
3
posted on
08/19/2003 12:53:34 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Arnold's positions are like the alien in Predator - you can't see them but you know they're lethal)
To: Theodore R.
A prelude to an under the table campaign for Michigan's Debbie S. for prez?
4
posted on
08/19/2003 12:54:29 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: Theodore R.
Makes sense that Orrin would be brown-nosing Ahhhnold.
He is a world-famous songwriter after all.
If you're going to do this, why even bother requiring the President to be a citizen, period?
5
posted on
08/19/2003 12:55:14 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
To: Theodore R.
Article II is as clear as can be:
"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President"
To: Diogenesis
Makes sense ----- in Scottish law, which he obeys.Are you confusing Orrin Hatch with Arlen Specter? Specter is the one who voted 'not proved', this article mentions Hatch voted for impeachment.
To: Theodore R.
Hatch is a traitor to the Republicans.
To: John Beresford Tipton
But Orrin G. Hatch thinks he is "above" the Constitution on this point: wiser and more compassionate than the Founding "Fathers." I still wonder what people in UT see in this senator, but he is apparently here to stay for many more years?
To: Theodore R.
NOOOWAY RINOS!
10
posted on
08/19/2003 12:57:45 PM PDT
by
VU4G10
(Have You Forgotten?)
To: Theodore R.
Cue the "Armor Hot Dogs" jingle...
11
posted on
08/19/2003 12:57:50 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: Gunslingr3
No, it was Hatch, not Specter. Specter voted against impeachment, but Hatch wound up reluctantly voting for both resolutions.
To: Theodore R.
NO!
13
posted on
08/19/2003 12:58:16 PM PDT
by
bedolido
(None of us is as dumb as all of us!)
To: Gunslingr3
Yes. Thanks
14
posted on
08/19/2003 12:58:52 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: Theodore R.
Is there any difference?
15
posted on
08/19/2003 12:59:03 PM PDT
by
Digger
To: Theodore R.
Hatch's proposal presumably would require a constitutional amendment.Presumably? Sheesh.
16
posted on
08/19/2003 12:59:03 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(The Road Map to Peace is looking more like a "Road Map to Pieces".)
To: Theodore R.
Batten down the Hatch, boys, he's flapping in the breeze.
17
posted on
08/19/2003 1:00:19 PM PDT
by
eniapmot
To: Theodore R.
IMHO, this proposal is DOA.
18
posted on
08/19/2003 1:01:34 PM PDT
by
elbucko
(Freedom. It won't make you smart, but you'll stupid without it.)
To: Theodore R.
What a fool! He & Teddy. That raps up your "Two-Party Cartel".
19
posted on
08/19/2003 1:01:41 PM PDT
by
Digger
To: Lil'freeper
ping
20
posted on
08/19/2003 1:01:46 PM PDT
by
big'ol_freeper
("When do I get to lift my leg on the liberal?")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson