[Hugin]

Imagine that Arnold wins. He then signs the new, improved Kalifornia "assault weapons" ban which adds the Springfield Armory M1A and the Ruger Mini-14 to the list of proscribed firearms. Please tell me why he would not do this.

He might, but he very well might not. At least he would listen to the arguments against before deciding.

Cruz Bustamental would not only sign it in a heartbeat, he would actively campaign to get it passed.

What McClintock would do is academic since he has no chance of being elected.

[William Tell]

Hugin said: "He might, but he very well might not. At least he would listen to the arguments against before deciding."

There are no rational arguments in favor of the present "assault weapons" laws. I challenge anyone to demonstrate that there is a crime problem associated with pistol grips or flash suppressors.

Arnold already stated his support for an irrational law and you want me to give him another chance to consider it? Do you anticipate that he will suddenly realize that no "assault weapons" should be outlawed? Will he come up with his own definition of an "assault weapon" to add to the many already on the books in several states and at the federal level?

The truth about "assault weapons" is already available. Arnold values my opinion on this issue so lowly that he parrots the liberal anti-gun nonsense.