[thoughtomator]

Nope, it's you that looks like an idiot with a cynical, deliberate misinterpretation of Santorum's remarks, which seems to be based in a perverse urge to expunge moral belief systems from the public shphere, a la ACLU phonies. When you make wild accusations with no facts to back them up, you only damage your own name.

[thoughtomator]

bleh... "sphere" yada yada

[xzins]

I'm waiting for an answer from Jorge. I think he's a libertarian Christian.

Many responses are Christian. Now that I think of it, his political responses are all libertarian.

Libertarian Christian is an extremely difficult balance. It's virtually impossible to be consistent, imho.

Take it easy on him for a while longer.

[Jorge]

Nope, it's you that looks like an idiot with a cynical, deliberate misinterpretation of Santorum's remarks, which seems to be based in a perverse urge to expunge moral belief systems from the public shphere, a la ACLU phonies. When you make wild accusations with no facts to back them up, you only damage your own name.

Give me a major break.

Show me where I misinterpreted Santorum's remarks.
The fact is you can't.

He clearly addressed the issue of privacy when it came to sex between consenting adults in the context of the sodomy case...and warned about the "dangers" of saying adultery and homosexuality were OK.

Now unless he was advocating the sex police busting down the bedroom doors of consenting adults and arresting them for acts of adultery and homosexuality, then his point is moot. And he should have thought before he spoke.