Posted on 09/09/2003 4:26:43 AM PDT by thackney
The Kremlin has introduced a draconian election law which threatens the media with closure if they give details of candidates' personal lives or analyse their policies. The new law aims to stem the "black PR" and slurs which marred past elections. But it has infuriated opposition MPs and journalists. Some said it represented a return to the Soviet era control of political debate.
The decree, signed by President Vladimir Putin, places a blanket ban during campaigning on forecasting results and requires candidates to be given equal coverage - a practical impossibility because there are 44 parties.
A media outlet can be shut during the electoral campaign after two warnings.
"The law substantially limits press freedoms," said Alexander Shishlov, a senior member of Yabloko, Russia's leading liberal party.
He said the law was even more draconian when the Kremlin presented it to parliament, and MPs removed some of its harsher clauses.
"Yet the law retains its repressive character," he said. "Its adoption is a very alarming sign [for Russia's future]."
The existence of the decree came to light after Mr Putin began the electoral campaign last week when he announced parliamentary elections on December 7.
The presidential election, which analysts consider a foregone conclusion for Mr Putin, is in March.
But Mr Putin seems to have fallen foul of the law himself. He appeared on national television last week endorsing Valentina Matvienko for election as governor of St Petersburg, although the law prohibits officials using their posts to promote their parties or re-election.
A court began hearing a against the appearance, but some high-ranking officials are, under the constitution, immune from prosecution.
The leader of the opposition Union of Right Forces, Boris Nemtsov, said: "We live in a country where everyone from the president to the pauper does not follow the laws. While this continues, we will have big problems."
Journalists in St Petersburg have been the first to face the new restrictions.
One newspaper left its front page blank in protest while filling its inside pages with articles about a fictional election in a faraway land - in reality the St Petersburg vote, but with candidates' names changed.
blanket ban during campaigning on forecasting results...
For those who claim freedom of speech violations when free people complain about the media coverage. This is what life is like without the US Constitution. Read it, Learn it and Protect it.
They got the idea from McCain-Feingold . . .
Just as Bill advocated the Independent Counsel law, and lived to understand the unfairness of it as it applied to him (Independent Counsel laws kick in when there is "an appearance of impropriety," but of course any journalist can synthesize an "appearance" out of thin air on a whim).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.