Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosierskypilot
They felt it was intrusive, rude and ill-mannered.

But not unhealthy. Thank you for your candor.

15 posted on 09/18/2003 1:26:50 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Trailerpark Badass; hoosierskypilot
They felt it was intrusive, rude and ill-mannered.

But not unhealthy. Thank you for your candor.

And when government panders to these "feelings" by legislation, they're wrong. When business owners make business decisions - even ones I don't like - I'm free to find others who see it my way.

BTW, in a restaurant with properly designed ventilation, smokers and non-smokers can each be satisfied. Merely designating a portion as "non-smoking" doesn't cut it. In common areas, such as the cashier's and maitre d's areas, as well as waiting rooms, the restaurant would probably choose to make them non-smoking.

17 posted on 09/18/2003 1:42:36 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson