Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesnuffy
Joe, I'm not trying to run you down, but truely, you didn't think before you wrote.

This was 2,500 years before Christ was born. The site is significant for the history that it holds. The site may or may not have religous significance, but it does have historical significance. Simply by defination, Christianity didn't exist back then.

I know you were only trying to put your religon into the thread, but it was thinly veiled.
8 posted on 09/21/2003 4:08:08 PM PDT by Lokibob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Lokibob
With people like that around I am truely suprised stonehenge made it through the medieval era and didn't suffer the same fate as those statues destroyed by the taliban.
9 posted on 09/21/2003 4:23:30 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Lokibob
"This was 2,500 years before Christ was born. The site is significant for the history that it holds. The site may or may not have religous significance, but it does have historical significance. Simply by defination, Christianity didn't exist back then."

Well said.
14 posted on 09/22/2003 9:32:32 AM PDT by FeliciaCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson